Desegregation-focused housing policies aimed at reducing disparities in neighborhood conditions may also reduce disparities in health outcomes. This paper examines the effects of one such policy on the health of pregnant people and their newborn infants. Specifically, I study the impact of Massachusetts Chapter 40B, a major civil rights-era housing policy that increases the supply of affordable ownership and rental housing in higher-income areas to facilitate moves for lower-income households to those areas. I use a difference-in-differences approach that compares the health outcomes of infants born to birthing people who move to 40B housing to those of infants born to demographically matched birthing people who move from similar origin neighborhoods to non-subsidized housing. Using this method, I find that moving to 40B housing produces meaningful improvements in birth outcomes and marginal gains in birthing parents’ health among 40B renters. I find no evidence of effects for 40B owners. Improvements in birth outcomes among renters are driven largely by people moving from neighborhoods with higher levels of poverty, more Black and Hispanic residents, and higher male incarceration rates. These results suggest that affordable housing policies like 40B can help reduce racial and economic disparities in early-life health among certain populations.
Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, September 2022