Prenatal Substance Use Policies and Infant Maltreatment Reports
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Report Publish Date: May 2022
This research article describes a study examining the relationship between state policies regarding prenatal substance use and reports of infant maltreatment.
Primary Takeaways
- Policies that criminalize prenatal substance use were associated with an increase in reports of infant maltreatment during the time studied.
- Punitive prenatal substance use policies led to greater reports of infant maltreatment by mothers across races and ethnicities.
- Prenatal substance use policies that supported moms’ substance use treatment did not increase infant maltreatment reports.
Overview and Objectives
The rate of maternal opioid misuse increased 131% from 2010 to 2017, and neonatal abstinence syndrome—infant withdrawal from opioid exposure—increased 83%. States have responded with a mix of policies, some that criminalize maternal substance use and define it as child maltreatment and others that give pregnant women priority in substance use disorder programs. The authors wanted to know whether these policies affect the number of reports of infant maltreatment in a state.
Hypothesis or Approach
The authors expected to find that punitive maternal substance use policies increased reports of child maltreatment. They used fiscal years 2004–2019 data on child maltreatment reports for children under age one from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System. They collected information about when state policies were in place from various sources.
How This Influences Change
“Findings suggest that punitive policies lead to large increases in substantiated infant maltreatment reports, which in turn may lead to child welfare system involvement soon after childbirth in states with these policies,” the authors write. “Policymakers should design interventions that emphasize support services and improve wellbeing for mothers and infants.”
Grant Details
Amount awarded:
$149,443
Awarded on: 09/01/2020
Timeframe: 2020-2022
Grant number: 77962
Location: New York, NY
About Grantee:
Contact Info
Cornell University, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College New York, NY 10065
websiteResearch: Go Deeper
Authors studied the effect of state punitive and supportive prenatal substance use policies on reports of infant maltreatment to child protection agencies. Punitive policies criminalize prenatal substance use or define it as child maltreatment, whereas supportive policies provide pregnant women with priority access to substance use disorder treatment programs. Using difference-in-differences methods, they found that total infant maltreatment reports increased by 19.0 percent after punitive policy adoption during the years of our study (2004–18). This growth was driven by a 38.4 percent increase in substantiated reports in which the mother was the alleged perpetrator. There were no changes in unsubstantiated reports after the adoption of punitive policies. They observed no changes in infant maltreatment reports after the adoption of supportive policies. Findings suggest that punitive policies lead to large increases in substantiated infant maltreatment reports, which in turn may lead to child welfare system involvement soon after childbirth in states with these policies. Policymakers should design interventions that emphasize support services and improving wellbeing for mothers and infants.
Health Affairs, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01755
Exhibit 1 States’ adoption of prenatal substance use policies by 2018, p 704
Research Team
This study and report was conducted and created by the following people.
- Maclean JC
- Witman A
- Piette Durrance C
- Atkins DN
- Meinhofer A
Similar Research to Explore
How Equity Strategies Can Make Healthcare Better for Everyone
Severe Maternal Health Outcomes Differ Across New Jersey Municipalities
Maternal Health Inequity During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Seeking Funding?
See how you can pave the way to a future where health is no longer a privilege, but a right.