Marketplace Pulse: Mixed Harvest
Skip to main content
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Our Vision
    • Our Vision Overview
    • Why Health Equity
    • Focus Areas
    • Measuring RWJF Progress
  • Grants
    • Grants Overview
    • Active Funding Opportunities
    • Awarded Grants
    • Grantee Stories
    • Grant Process
    • Grantee Resources
  • Insights
    • Insights Overview
    • Blog
    • Our Research
    • Advocacy And Policy
  • About RWJF
    • About RWJF Overview
    • Our Guiding Principles
    • How We Work
    • Impact Investments
    • Staff And Trustees
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
Find A Grant

    Marketplace Pulse: Mixed Harvest

    Brief Jan-03-2018 | Hempstead K | 3-min read
    1. Insights
    2. Our Research
    3. Marketplace Pulse: Mixed Harvest
    Farm state premiums chart Bronze plan chart

    The Marketplace Pulse series provides expert insights on timely policy topics related to the health insurance marketplaces. The series, authored by RWJF Senior Policy Adviser Katherine Hempstead, analyzes changes in the individual market; shifting carrier trends; nationwide insurance data; and more to help states, researchers, and policymakers better understand the pulse of the marketplace.

    Many have bemoaned the state of the current individual market in rural states. As we have seen, the 2018 plan year has been relatively unkind to the unsubsidized, and generally, the farm population is more likely to live in states with less well-functioning individual markets, due to a combination of both policy and structural risk factors.

    While many U.S. farms today are managed by employees of giant corporations, the United States still counts more than 3 million farmers, or "farm operators" in the United States as termed by the most recent Census of Agriculture. Despite their relatively small numbers, farmers are an important economic and political constituency in many states. While some farmers and/or their spouses have off-farm jobs that provide insurance, many are self-employed, and therefore more likely to be uninsured or in need of individual coverage. In fact, 14 percent of farm operators were uninsured in 2015, and 17 percent purchased insurance in the individual market.

    Compounding those demographics, farm operators, as a group, are not young. In 2015, only 8 percent were younger than 35 years old, and their household income averaged approximately $120,000 (roughly double the national average), suggesting that they would be likely to have a fairly strong demand for health insurance and a relatively low likelihood of qualifying for subsidies. In 2015, the average farmer spent more than $5,400 on premiums and out-of-pocket expenses.

    Yet looking more closely at top 10 farm states, as measured by farmers as a share of population, they reflect a wide range of outcomes. Because many farmers are unsubsidized, we compare the premium for the cheapest bronze plan available either on or off the exchange, choosing the most expensive rating area in the state. Some states, such as Idaho, Montana, and North Dakota, have greater participation and lower premiums than states like Nebraska, Iowa, and Wyoming. Depending on their county of residence, a farmer in Nebraska will pay more than twice as much for the cheapest bronze plan compared to a farmer in Idaho.

    Many factors help to explain these large differences. For example, very rural Wyoming is considered to be a state with above-average medical costs, at least from the standpoint of its group insurance premiums. However, the state policy environment is probably relevant. States with higher premiums and larger increases in premiums are more likely to have policies which have been identified as risk factors for poor market outcomes, such as permitting grandmothered plans and the sale of limited coverage products. Nebraska and Wyoming, for example, have three policy risk factors apiece, while Idaho and North Dakota have one or two. This simple comparison does not account for other relevant state differences. While many states have permitted grandmothered plans, enrollment is often relatively small. However, Iowa has a very large grandmothered plan, so the impact on their market is probably greater. The fact that the state Blue plan does not participate in the ACA-compliant market in either Iowa or Nebraska probably makes things worse in these states than they would be otherwise.

    Aggressive advertising for non-compliant plans aimed at unsubsidized consumers have even prompted stark consumer warnings. In Iowa, the Insurance Department warned of “outright fraudulent calls” from marketers of plans that offer inadequate coverage and would not exempt consumers from the individual mandate’s requirement. A department spokesman explained: “If people choose to have something rather than nothing, they should go into it with their eyes open.” While this grim advice is perhaps appropriate, a different policy environment could have led to a better set of choices for consumers.

    Despite the calls for more state flexibility in the implementation of the ACA, there is ample evidence that the impact of state decision-making on premiums and carrier participation has already been considerable. In a world with no individual mandate and expanded opportunities to sell non-comprehensive coverage, the divisions between states will likely deepen, and market conditions will deteriorate further for unsubsidized farmers and others seeking comprehensive coverage in states that don’t protect their risk pool. 

    Related Content

    Brief
    A teen boy looking out of a window.

    Marketplace Pulse: Differences in Cost-Sharing for Mental Health and Primary Care Services Persist

    Unmet demand for mental health services is a longstanding healthcare problem. There is an increasing awareness of insurance barriers such as inadequate provider networks and claims denials.

    4-min read

    Brief
    Two doctors talking with a patient.

    Marketplace Pulse: Leading Medicaid MCOs in States that Have Reported Medicaid Disenrollment

    Early data on Medicaid redetermination suggests that disenrollment is occurring rapidly, at least in some places.

    6-min read

    Brief
    A concept to illustrate the economic impact of the Covid-19 virus on the restaurant and catering business. Restaurant owner wearing his chefâ  s whites standing in his empty restaurant. Photographed on location in a restaurant on the island of Møn in Denmark.

    Marketplace Pulse: Work Requirements in Medicaid and Behavioral Healthcare

    Adding work requirements to the Medicaid program would lead to an increase in the number of uninsured and would have negative implications for behavioral healthcare.

    5-min read

    View all
    SHOW MORE
    +

    SHARE

    Subscribe to receive Funding Alerts & more

    Explore the latest in reflection and research from subject matter experts at RWJF and our wide network of partners.

    Email address already subscribed. Please check your inbox to manage your subscriptions.

    Subscribed!

    Thank you. You are now subscribed.

    Tell us what type of content you want to receive.

    Be informed with our weekly newsletter updating you with relevant news and research around a Culture of Health, as well as the latest funding opportunities.

    Get funded by RWJF: Receive notifications when new funding opportunities are released.

    Receive monthly updates on RWJF-sponsored research that informs many robust health policy debates on Capitol Hill, covering topics like health equity, improving access to quality healthcare, equitable housing, and more.

    Shop talk for researchers. This monthly newsletter covers research news and opportunities from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

    Sometimes we have news, announcements or opportunities that don't quite fit the subscription parameters above. If you're interested, we'll send you this information under "There's more...". *If you've indicated you are an EU resident, we will only send these communications if you intentionally check this box.

    Yes! I want to tell you more about myself and receive personalized communications in the future.

    Area(s) Of Interest

    Which profession or pursuit best describes you?

    Unsubscribe

    Stop receiving all emails from RWJF

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
    • CONTACT RWJF

      50 College Road East

      Princeton, NJ 08540-6614

       

      US Toll Free: (877) 843-7953

      International: +1 (609) 627-6000

    • MANAGE YOUR GRANTS

      MyRWJF Login

      • Twitter link
      • Facebook link
      • LinkedIn link
      • YouTube link

    • Our Vision
      • Our Vision Overview
      • Why Health Equity
      • Focus Areas
      • Measuring RWJF Progress
    • Grants
      • Grants Overview
      • Active Funding Opportunities
      • Awarded Grants
      • Grantee Stories
      • Grant Process
      • Grantee Resources
    • Insights
      • Insights Overview
      • Blog
      • Our Research
      • Advocacy And Policy
    • About RWJF
      • About RWJF Overview
      • Our Guiding Principles
      • How We Work
      • Impact Investments
      • Staff And Trustees
      • Newsroom
      • Careers
      • Contact Us

    ©2001- 

    Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. All Rights Reserved. 

     

    • Manage Email
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms and Conditions