We also decided that, while offering both the original and the updated versions of the bike visual, we would create a new and different visual about equity that is more inclusive. We wanted to offer an option that represents a more real-world situation, aligns better with the Foundation’s commitment to advancing health equity, and fits better with our style.
What You Told Us
To inform development of a new image, we surveyed readers of RWJF’s weekly newsletter, Advances, this year. In the survey, we asked subscribers to vote between the original 2017 graphic or an alternative we had just created.
Our survey got a massive response, with more than 1,100 people voting for their preference and more than 500 taking the time to share comments. Many commented on how useful the visual was, but also offered suggestions to improve it:
To inform development of a new image, we surveyed readers of RWJF’s weekly newsletter, Advances, this year. In the survey, we asked subscribers to vote between the original 2017 graphic or an alternative we had just created.
Our survey got a massive response, with more than 1,100 people voting for their preference and more than 500 taking the time to share comments. Many commented on how useful the visual was, but also offered suggestions to improve it:
- Both options were highly regarded, with preferences almost split right down the middle (662 respondents preferred the original visual, and 520 liked the new version).
- There were differing opinions about whether to include text.
- Other feedback focused on racial and ethnic diversity, disability inclusion, and community conditions.
A New Equality/Equity Visual
The survey results led us to create both an updated bike graphic and a graphic based on an entirely new concept, which uses a curb to visualize the issue and introduces different characteristics of individuals and their environments. We used a human-centered design approach, ensuring the process was transparent and sharing drafts with a broad, diverse set of people including RWJF staff and consultants, members of our diversity-related committees, and many others. We gathered feedback from people with lived experiences with disability, parents of children facing accessibility challenges, and people in many fields and sectors. Their perspectives added great value to the work.
Our process took into account how the visual would be used and in what situations and we prioritized developing a clear, simple graphic that was accessible and could be featured in fast-moving environments such as the web and social media, and in presentations. Our goal was to make it simple enough for a wide array of audiences to use and understand.