Some warned her that the neighborhood was dangerous, that once it got dark at night the streets weren’t safe. But others felt it was a much simpler issue: it was dark because people couldn’t afford light bulbs for outside their homes. The darkness made people feel like they didn’t have control over their own safety, and that in turn led to negative assumptions that further exacerbated the problem.
So the residents and the coordinator crafted a simple solution. After giving residents advance notice, they recruited volunteers from local neighborhood organizations to go around and count the number of outdoor light fixtures missing bulbs. They got bulbs donated by a local hardware store owner, and they scheduled a free barbecue and community lighting ceremony. Residents named the event Take Back the Light and when the lights came on, the music started, and the food was served, barriers broke down even further.
Neighbors talked to neighbors they had been wary of, and everyone saw their direct role in addressing a problem that was important to the community. Residents who previously had no formal leadership role in the community became leaders because of their involvement with Take Back the Light. Success belonged to the group, and the community’s capacity grew. They began to talk about other challenges in their neighborhood that needed to be addressed. As this organization took root, the coordinator changed her title to “community coach” to illustrate her community-centered, supportive role.
Stories like this illustrate the core components of the Self-Healing Community Model that Laura Porter and her colleagues developed in Washington in the 1990s. This model helps communities build their own capacity to define and solve problems. We’re pleased to publish these new papers illustrating the model and sharing information about the success Washington state has seen working with it.
This Self-Healing Community Model is focused on four phases:
- Leadership expansion: Expanding the circle of people who are actively engaged in leading community improvement efforts makes them more likely to succeed.
- Focus: Generating a shared understanding of the values and priorities that make up the local culture helps residents generate solutions everyone wants to support.
- Cycles of learning: Interactive and reflective processes support the learning of community members and lead to continuous transformation.
- Results: Local participation in research and reporting of outcomes motivates communities to improve their strategies and activities based on the gap between current outcomes and their aspirations for community and family life.
Starting in the mid-1990s, these phases of community engagement played out in counties and Tribes across Washington. Researchers measured and tracked outcomes as this work was getting underway, so they know that this model can move the needle on some of the most intractable problems communities face. Over about 10 years in Cowlitz County:
- Births to teen mothers went down 62 percent;
- Infant mortality went down 43 percent;
- Youth suicide and suicide attempts went down 98 percent;
- Youth arrests for violent crime went down 53 percent; and,
- High school dropout rates went down 47 percent.
Each of these is a dramatically better improvement than the state as a whole saw during the same time period. One study of their work found that, with a budget of just $8 million, they ended up saving $55 million over two years by reducing rates of teen pregnancy, juvenile felonies, school dropouts and out-of-home placement of children.