Here’s what we in healthcare and public health must do.
First, we must acknowledge the role of healthcare and public health in perpetuating racism—from forced sterilization of Black women to the infamous Tuskegee syphilis study to the exclusion of Black physicians from organized medicine. In addition, we continue to have an unequal healthcare system, in which the public hospitals and clinics that primarily serve Black populations have consistently been underfunded. That must be fixed—and we should push for getting it fixed.
Second, we must participate in local, state, and national conversations on reparations. We know that Black people have been systematically denied the opportunities for good health that White Americans enjoy. We also know that if we close the racial wealth gap and improve access to key resources that influence health, we can expect to dramatically improve the health and life expectancy of Black Americans.
Third, we must focus on health outcomes as a key measure of equity. As I said earlier, for me, eliminating the racial wealth gap is not the end goal. Eliminating racial gaps in health and longevity is the end goal. As long as Black Americans live shorter, sicker lives, equity remains theoretical.
You’re working with a young and dynamic research team on this project to explore this intersection of reparations and health. What have they taught you?
Dr. Bassett: Our team of junior researchers and early career investigators are interested in applying research methods to important societal issues. They view scholar activism as part of their contribution to public health, and they look up to people like W.E B. Dubois. These are people who will apply for NIH grants, but they also want to talk about bigger issues with less certain outcomes.
They come from many universities, including Boston University, Drexel, Duke, McGill, University of Pennsylvania, City University of New York, University of Miami, and Harvard Medical School. They also represent a range of disciplines, including history, health policy, economics, data modeling, epidemiology, sociology, and even philosophy.
Collectively, we call this group the Consortium. It’s about the exchange of ideas and collaboration; it’s not about competition. It’s about articulating obstacles and jointly considering the path forward. And it’s just been wonderful.
At this moment, what gives you hope that we will make progress on this issue and other issues related more broadly to race, health, and equity?
Dr. Bassett: What gives me hope is that there has been progress. We shouldn’t deny that there’s been enormous progress, even though much more remains to be made. The fact that reparations is no longer a fringe issue is inspiring to me.
The other thing that gives me hope, personally, is this wave of early career researchers who are very dedicated to this work, some of whom I’ve been fortunate to work with on this project. Seeing these early career investigators committed to providing evidence for an issue that we agree has moral momentum has been inspiring to me.
In addition, there’s the fact that we in health and public health are a tent under which anyone can gather. Everyone values their health. Perhaps if we framed reparations as something that would not only address the unfair gap in wealth but that would also help us all live long and healthy lives, we could build the support we need.
Learn about the New Jersey Reparations Council where RWJF’s Maisha Simmons serves as a co-director on the Council’s Health Equity Committee and Rich Besser serves as a member of the same committee.
And draw from the experience of reparations and healing in New Zealand by reading an essay by Fabiola Cineas in the Stanford Social Innovation Review and watching a Vox video she narrates—both supported by RWJF.