>> More...
Published: Aug 27, 2009
The Health Policy Tracking Service, which was started by the National Conference of State Legislatures, provides information on important developments in state legislation, policies and programs affecting health care, primarily through Web-based reports and databases. Its primary audience is state legislators and their staffs.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) was a long-term supporter of the tracking service. (See Grants Results for grant ID# 038868 for a report on RWJF's support from 1997–2002.)
From July 2003 through April 2005, RWJF grant ID# 048709 was made so that the tracking service would provide focused reports in the areas of women's health; public health preparedness; insurance reform; and tobacco-use prevention, control and restrictions. Yet, in the National Conference of State Legislatures' reports to RWJF, it is clear that the Health Policy Tracking Service did not cover these subjects. Instead, it continued to provide its regular publications.
In spite of this, RWJF continued to support these regular publications through July 2007. Part of this support funded access to the tracking service for RWJF program officers and national program office staff. The grants also subsidized subscription rates for small nonprofit organizations.
During the course of the RWJF grants, the Health Policy Tracking Service changed ownership twice-transitioning from a nonprofit organization to a for-profit company. The National Conference of State Legislatures sold the tracking service to NetScan iPublishing, a for-profit company in Falls Church, Va., on January 1, 2004. The project director moved to NetScan with the project. Then, in January 2005, Thomson Reuters, a for-profit company, in New York City, purchased NetScan, including the tracking service. The company integrated NetScan into its existing operations.
Key Results
In reports to RWJF, project directors from the three entities owning the Health Policy Tracking Service stated that it produced the following reports:
In addition, about 13 RWJF program officers and staff from about 23 national program offices accessed the Health Policy Tracking Service.
Funding
RWJF supported this project through four grants totaling $592,085 to the National Conference of State Legislatures in Washington; NetScan iPublishing in Falls Church, Va.; and Thomson Reuters in New York. Other funders included the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services' Center for Substance Abuse Treatment as well as the California Health Care Foundation.
After the Grant
After the last grant ended, RWJF opted not to continue paying for access to the Health Policy Tracking Service because its program officers and national program office staff were no longer using the service enough to justify continued funding.
Thomson Reuters has continued to sell subscriptions to the Health Policy Tracking Service through its Westlaw online database (as of May 2009).
There are currently no additional readings for this publication.
Listed below are 2 of the grants that supported this project, totaling $182,922.
| Grant | Awarded to | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Providing information on state health policy legislation through the Health Policy Tracking Service |
National Conference of State Legislatures (Washington, DC) ID#: 045778 Lee Dixon 202-255-9190 lee_dixon210@msn.com http://www.ncsl.org |
Actual award: $30,000 May 2003 to June 2003 |
| Information on state health policy legislation |
National Conference of State Legislatures (Washington, DC) ID#: 048709 Lee Dixon 202-255-9190 lee_dixon210@msn.com http://www.ncsl.org |
Approved award: $343,710 Actual award: $152,922 July 2003 to December 2003 |
RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.
Grant Results Reports
RWJF produces Grant Results reports on its funded initiatives. External writers and editors read the entire grant to prepare each report, which is then reviewed by RWJF staff and by the director of the initiative. Any reviewer in the chain may ask for changes in the report to improve clarity or accuracy.
Read more about our approach.