Researchers Evaluate the Feasibility of a No-Fault System for Medically Injured Patients in Utah and Colorado

Published: Sep 01, 2006

Get full text or downloads

  • Grant Results Report

From 1994 to 1997, staff at two organizations worked to develop administrative no-fault malpractice compensation systems in Colorado and Utah and to collect and analyze medical-injury data for the two states. Project staff also examined financial, policy and legal issues critical to the design of a no-fault system.

The organizations were:

  • Copic Insurance Co., a physician-owned professional liability carrier in Colorado.
  • Utah Alliance for Health Care, a nonprofit coalition of Utah health care provider organizations and other interests.

Both of these organizations also worked with a Harvard University academic team — headed by Troyen A. Brennan, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., a physician and lawyer on the Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health faculties as well as on the staff of Brigham and Women's Hospital, a Harvard teaching affiliate — to oversee the research.

The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) Improving Malpractice Prevention and Compensation Systems national program.

Key Results

  • In both Colorado and Utah, the preparation of an administrative system was not completed, and a no-fault system was never implemented.

Key Findings
Among the findings of the medical-injury study, the Harvard team reported that:

  • The adverse event rate among hospitalized patients in each state in 1992 was an estimated 2.9 percent. (An adverse event was defined as an injury caused by medical management and resulting in either a prolonged hospital stay or disability at time of discharge.)
  • The cost of all adverse events in the two states in 1992 totaled $661.9 million, substantially exceeding the money spent on the current medical malpractice system.
  • The estimated annual cost of a no-fault model could be significantly reduced by restricting compensation to certain "avoidability" and disability criteria.

Funding
RWJF supported this project through five grants totaling $1,726,794:

  • Two grants to Copic Medical Foundation.
  • One grant to Utah Alliance for Healthcare.
  • Two grants to Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Tags:

Share:
Share

There are currently no additional readings for this publication.


Listed below are 5 of the grants that supported this project, totaling $1,726,794.

Grant Awarded to Amount
Feasibility of alternative compensation plan for iatrogenic injuries -- Phase II Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA)
ID#: 029907
Troyen A. Brennan, J.D., M.D., M.P.H.
tabrennan@partners.org
http://www.brighamandwomens.org/
Approved award: $197,123
Actual award: $150,677
August 1996 to July 1997
Measure the reliability of two chart review methods for detecting adverse events Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA)
ID#: 032865
Troyen A. Brennan, J.D., M.D., M.P.H.
tabrennan@partners.org
http://www.brighamandwomens.org/
Approved award: $114,078
Actual award: $105,696
October 1997 to June 1998
Implementation of a no-fault enterprise liability compensation plan Utah Alliance for Healthcare, Inc. (Salt Lake City, UT)
ID#: 023685
Elliott J. Williams
801-521-5678
Approved award: $729,520
Actual award: $627,932
November 1994 to October 1996
Transition to no-fault compensation plan Copic Medical Foundation (Englewood, CO)
ID#: 029969
K. Mason Howard, M.D.
303-779-0044
Actual award: $19,320
August 1996 to October 1996
Feasibility of alternative compensation plan for iatrogenic injuries Copic Medical Foundation (Englewood, CO)
ID#: 022603
K. Mason Howard, M.D.
303-779-0044
Actual award: $823,169
November 1994 to April 1996

RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.

More on Quality/Equality

View resources and information on health care quality.

Grant Results Reports
RWJF produces Grant Results reports on its funded initiatives. External writers and editors read the entire grant to prepare each report, which is then reviewed by RWJF staff and by the director of the initiative. Any reviewer in the chain may ask for changes in the report to improve clarity or accuracy.

Read more about our approach.

My presentation builder (beta)

You have not collected any slides or slideshows for your presentation. Learn more about the presentation builder and search for slides on our Web site.