>> More...
Published: June 2008
Nearly one in three young adults ages 19-26 lacks health insurance, accounting for 28 percent of America's uninsured population. This Urban Institute analysis looks at why young adults are disproportionately uninsured and what policies could address their coverage gaps.
While conventional wisdom suggests that these largely healthy young adults reject coverage because of their youth and vitality, the facts tell a more complicated tale. As children transition to adulthood, they often lose the security of their parents' employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) or coverage through Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Large numbers of young adults do not work full time and are not full-time students, leaving them without their own ESI—or their parents'—and without the income to afford private market coverage.
This lack of coverage significantly lowers the likelihood that young adults will receive needed care when they are sick. Compared with their insured peers, they are more than twice as likely not to fill a needed prescription due to cost; not to see a specialist when needed; not to get a medical test, treatment or follow-up; and not to see a provider when they have a medical problem.
The authors examine the root causes of unisurance among young adults and assess the potential effects of such policy options as tax credits, Medicaid expansions and individual mandates.
Do Individual Mandates Matter?
By:
Blumberg LJ and Holahan J
Publication date:
January 30, 2008
Summary:
In this Urban Institute analysis, health economists contend that it is not possible to achieve universal coverage without an individual mandate.
Health Coverage Tax Credits: A Small Program Offering Large Policy Lessons
By:
Dorn S
Publication date:
Feb 5, 2008
Summary:
This Urban Institute policy brief analyzes how current tax credits can be restructured to reach more workers who qualify and how future tax credits could be designed to serve millions of uninsured Americans more effectively.
The Failure of SCHIP Reauthorization: What Next?
By:
Kenney G
Publication date:
March 18, 2008
Summary:
In this issue brief, the Urban Institute reflects on important House and Senate compromises that resulted in passage of a bipartisan bill to expand SCHIP in 2007, only to repeatedly face President Bush's veto pen. SCHIP was ultimately extended through March 2009, but...
High Costs, Low Incomes and SCHIP Reauthorization
By:
Kenney G and Pelletier J
Publication date:
January 12, 2009
Summary:
This Urban Institute analysis compares current costs of living and costs of employer-sponsored insurance with figures from a decade ago.
SCHIP Reauthorization: How Will Low-Income Kids Benefit Under House and Senate Bills?
By:
Kenney G, Cook A and Pelletier J
Publication date:
September 18, 2007
Summary:
This policy brief discusses findings from empirical work examining the likely income distribution of children who would gain and/or retain health insurance coverage through the proposed Senate and House SCHIP bills.
Eligible But Not Enrolled: How SCHIP Reauthorization Can Help
By:
Dorn S and The Urban Institute
Publication date:
September 29, 2007
Summary:
According to an analysis from the Urban Institute, SCHIP reauthorization could give states the flexibility to draw on lessons from strategies recently developed by Medicare for providing Medicaid and SCHIP to eligible low-income kids.
Concerns About Parents Dropping Employer Coverage to Enroll in SCHIP Overlook Issues of Affordability
By:
Zuckerman S, Perry C and The Urban Institute
Publication date:
October 02, 2007
Summary:
The analysis from the Urban Institute documents that low-income families have difficulty affording employer-sponsored insurance when measured on CMS' affordability scale and that by limiting premiums and other out-of-pocket spending, Medicaid and SCHIP make health care...
Can the President's Health Care Tax Proposal Serve as an Effective Substitute for SCHIP Expansion?
By:
Blumberg L, The Urban Institute and Perry C
Publication date:
October 12, 2007
Summary:
Nearly 40 percent of a low-income family's earnings will need to be spent on health insurance if a Bush administration proposal to use the tax system to subsidize coverage is enacted, a new Urban Institute analysis has found.