What are the respective roles of the public and private sectors in drug development? This question is at the heart of some policy proposals, such as those that would give the government a share of profits from drugs at least partly developed with federal research dollars.
This paper provides empirical data on these issues, using information included in the patents on drugs approved between 1988 and 2005. Overall, researchers found that direct government funding is more important in the development of “priority-review” drugs—sometimes described as the most innovative new drugs—than it is for “standard-review” drugs. Government funding has played an indirect role—for example, by funding basic underlying research that is built on in the drug discovery process—in almost half of the drugs approved and in almost two-thirds of priority-review drugs.
This study's findings should help inform thinking about the returns on public research funding—a topic of long-standing interest to economists, policy-makers, and health advocates.