A series in the journal Tobacco Control explores potential "endgames" for tobacco use.
Princeton, N.J., and Ann Arbor, Mich.—What would it take to end tobacco use once and for all?
This is the question several scholars, scientists, and policy experts address in a provocative series of articles on various strategies for eliminating tobacco use, if not entirely, at least enough to significantly slow the global death toll estimated at 1 billion people by the end of this century. It's called the tobacco endgame—unique and radical strategies to end tobacco dependence.
Through a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, with additional support provided by the American Legacy Foundation, Kenneth Warner hosted a meeting of 40 top tobacco control advocates last June that discussed endgame strategies. The series of articles published in the journal Tobacco Control was an outgrowth of that discussion.
From dramatically reducing nicotine to total abolition of cigarette sales, the series of articles includes six endgame strategies and a number of essays written to encourage public debate, said Warner, the Avedis Donabedian Distinguished University Professor of Public Health and professor of health management and policy at the University of Michigan.
Some of the strategies outlined in the articles include:
Although smoking has declined significantly in most developed nations due to policy changes and increased education about the health hazards, tobacco control advocates say too many people continue to die from the most preventable cause of premature death and illness.
"What we are doing today is not enough," Warner said. "Even if we do very well with tobacco control, as we have for several decades now, we'll have a huge number of smokers for years to come, and smoking will continue to cause millions of deaths.”
It's estimated that worldwide currently some 6 million people a year die from illness caused by cigarettes, including more than 400,000 in the U.S. alone.
"The need for an endgame comes from the recognition that we do not have to accept the industrial marketing of tobacco, and that current policies—successful as they have been—will likely not make the tobacco problem disappear," Elizabeth Smith of the University of California-San Francisco, who edited the publication. "Discussion of an endgame can inspire new visions of the possible."
Laurel Thomas Gnagey | University of Michigan School of Public Health | firstname.lastname@example.org | 734-647-1841
Christine Clayton | Robert Wood Johnson Foundation | email@example.com | 609-627-5937
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation focuses on the pressing health and health care issues facing our country. As the nation’s largest philanthropy devoted exclusively to health and health care, the Foundation works with a diverse group of organizations and individuals to identify solutions and achieve comprehensive, measurable, and timely change. For more than 40 years the Foundation has brought experience, commitment, and a rigorous, balanced approach to the problems that affect the health and health care of those it serves. When it comes to helping Americans lead healthier lives and get the care they need, the Foundation expects to make a difference in your lifetime. Follow the Foundation on Twitter www.rwjf.org/twitter or Facebook www.rwjf.org/facebook.