 Favorites |
 Google |
 Digg |
 Del.icio.us |
 Twitter |
 Facebook |
>> More...
Health Insurance Exchanges
Organizing Health Insurance Marketplaces to Promote Health Reform Goals
Published: April 21, 2009
Get full text or downloads
The focus on national health care reform has given rise to a number of proposals for revamping the health insurance marketplace so that all Americans would have affordable coverage. One option supported by President Obama, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and other health policy leaders involves the government establishing a public health insurance exchange to effectively organize an insurance market for those without coverage.
Their theory is that a national health insurance exchange would provide coordination and guidance to insurance markets to help them comply with consumer protections and compete in cost-efficient ways that would result in more Americans obtaining coverage.
Advocates of a public exchange say it could also help purchasers and insurers address some of the problems that currently exist in private health insurance markets, such as insufficient risk spreading, discrimination, out of control costs, poor delivery of subsidies, troubles facilitating and ensuring enrollment, and underinsurance. These fundamental challenges have long hindered the efficacy of our nation’s health care system while contributing to the growing numbers of Americans who either have no insurance or insurance that is inadequate to meet their current and potential health care needs.
In this paper, researchers from the Urban Institute and Georgetown University review some of the key problems facing purchasers of insurance—whether they be individuals or employers—and outline whether and how a public health insurance exchange might address them. The paper also highlights lessons that can be learned from the experience of prior efforts to create and operate exchanges, such as the Commonwealth Connector in Massachusetts.
The authors conclude a well-designed exchange can help bring about changes that can move the system toward many of the nation’s most oft-stated health reform goals. Without an exchange, the authors assert that a patchwork of new agencies at the state and federal level—in addition to new roles for existing agencies—would be required to achieve similar reform objectives.
Share:
Recommended
- Health Coverage Tax Credits: A Small Program Offering Large Policy Lessons (Issue and policy briefs)
- The Failure of SCHIP Reauthorization: What Next? (Issue and policy briefs)
- Health Insurance Coverage of Young Adults (Issue and policy briefs)
- High Costs, Low Incomes and SCHIP Reauthorization (Issue and policy briefs)
- SCHIP Reauthorization: How Will Low-Income Kids Benefit Under House and Senate Bills? (Issue and policy briefs)
- Eligible But Not Enrolled: How SCHIP Reauthorization Can Help (Issue and policy briefs)
- Show more
Health Coverage Tax Credits: A Small Program Offering Large Policy Lessons
By:
Dorn S
Publication date:
Feb 5, 2008
Summary:
This Urban Institute policy brief analyzes how current tax credits can be restructured to reach more workers who qualify and how future tax credits could be designed to serve millions of uninsured Americans more effectively.
The Failure of SCHIP Reauthorization: What Next?
By:
Kenney G
Publication date:
March 18, 2008
Summary:
In this issue brief, the Urban Institute reflects on important House and Senate compromises that resulted in passage of a bipartisan bill to expand SCHIP in 2007, only to repeatedly face President Bush's veto pen. SCHIP was ultimately extended through March 2009, but...
Health Insurance Coverage of Young Adults
Publication date:
June 2008
Summary:
An Urban Institute analysis looks at why young adults, accounting for 28 percent of America's uninsured population, are disproportionately uninsured and what policies could address their coverage gaps.
High Costs, Low Incomes and SCHIP Reauthorization
By:
Kenney G and Pelletier J
Publication date:
January 12, 2009
Summary:
This Urban Institute analysis compares current costs of living and costs of employer-sponsored insurance with figures from a decade ago.
SCHIP Reauthorization: How Will Low-Income Kids Benefit Under House and Senate Bills?
By:
Kenney G, Cook A and Pelletier J
Publication date:
September 18, 2007
Summary:
This policy brief discusses findings from empirical work examining the likely income distribution of children who would gain and/or retain health insurance coverage through the proposed Senate and House SCHIP bills.
Eligible But Not Enrolled: How SCHIP Reauthorization Can Help
By:
Dorn S and The Urban Institute
Publication date:
September 29, 2007
Summary:
According to an analysis from the Urban Institute, SCHIP reauthorization could give states the flexibility to draw on lessons from strategies recently developed by Medicare for providing Medicaid and SCHIP to eligible low-income kids.
Concerns About Parents Dropping Employer Coverage to Enroll in SCHIP Overlook Issues of Affordability
By:
Zuckerman S, Perry C and The Urban Institute
Publication date:
October 02, 2007
Summary:
The analysis from the Urban Institute documents that low-income families have difficulty affording employer-sponsored insurance when measured on CMS' affordability scale and that by limiting premiums and other out-of-pocket spending, Medicaid and SCHIP make health care...
Can the President's Health Care Tax Proposal Serve as an Effective Substitute for SCHIP Expansion?
By:
Blumberg L, The Urban Institute and Perry C
Publication date:
October 12, 2007
Summary:
Nearly 40 percent of a low-income family's earnings will need to be spent on health insurance if a Bush administration proposal to use the tax system to subsidize coverage is enacted, a new Urban Institute analysis has found.
