>> More...
Published: February 25, 2009
This paper examines judicial interpretations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and discusses the opportunities to enact health care reform initiatives in light of those interpretations.
ERISA is a federal law regulating the administration of private employer-sponsored benefits including health benefits (i.e., health insurance offered by an employer). Because the federal government generally has exercised its authority to pre-empt state regulation of the administration of private employer-sponsored health plans, states are blocked from enforcing laws interfering with ERISA.
As many states pursue health care reform experiments, ERISA preemption becomes relevant as a potential limit on the scope and type of reforms states are able to enact. The dominant trend in ERISA litigation has been to pre-empt state legislation and litigation interfering with the administration of private employer-sponsored health plans, making large-scale state health care reform initiatives difficult.
This paper discusses:
(The paper notes that individual mandates have not yet been litigated under ERISA, but courts are unlikely to find that individual mandates bind administrators and dictate plan choices.)
The paper observes that while it is difficult to easily predict what will be pre-empted, there is consistency that emerges over time, which is the return to preemption as a default.
Given this trend, the author concludes that states must tread carefully in crafting health care reform initiatives that address the crisis of the uninsured without impermissibly burdening private employers' provision of employee benefit plans.
This white paper is part of the Legal Solutions in Health Reform project. It was created by the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University. The project aims to identify practical, workable solutions to the legal issues that may arise in any upcoming federal health reform debate.
Keywords: Policy reform ideas, Delivery systems, Mandates, Legal issues/reforms, Federalism, Regulation, State models for national reforms, Administrative cost/structure, Play-or-pay, Market reform ideas, Insurance exchange
Listed below is one grant that supported this project.
| Grant | Awarded to | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Studying legal challenges in health reform to assist policy-makers and other key stakeholders |
Georgetown University Law Center (Washington, DC) ID#: 64475 Timothy Mark Westmoreland, J.D. 202-662-9876 westmort@law.georgetown.edu http://www.law.georgetown.edu |
Actual award: $689,057 July 2008 to September 2009 |
RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.
Introduction: Legal Solutions in Health Reform
By:
Connors EE and Westmoreland TM
Publication date:
February 2009
Summary:
This introduction paper lays out the formulation of the Legal Solutions in Health Reform project, why health reform is important, the pertinent legal questions applicable to federal health reform, and three themes that surface throughout the identified legal...
Privacy and Health Information Technology
By:
McGraw D
Publication date:
February 25, 2009
Summary:
The increased use of health information technology (health IT) is a common element of nearly every health reform proposal. While health IT has the potential to decrease costs, improve health outcomes, coordinate care, and improve public health, increasing the...
The Purchase of Insurance Across State Lines In the Individual Insurance Market
By:
Kanwit S
Publication date:
February 2009
Summary:
This paper outlines the obstacles to enacting purchase of insurance across state lines (PASL) and potential solutions, and concludes that as long as the legislation is thoughtfully drafted, there is no significant legal or Constitutional barrier to enacting PASL.
Insurance Discrimination On The Basis Of Health Status: An Overview of Discrimination Practices, Federal Law, and Federal Reform Options
By:
Rosenbaum S
Publication date:
February 2009
Summary:
This paper provides a brief overview of discrimination practices, the federal law and federal reform options to manage discriminatory practices in the insurance and employee health benefit markets.
The Constitutionality of Mandates to Purchase Health Insurance
By:
Hall MA
Publication date:
February 2009
Summary:
This paper identifies and analyzes the legal issues and solutions for a health insurance exchange if administered through the federal or state government or through a private entity.
Health Insurance Exchanges: Legal Issues
By:
Stolzfus Jost T
Publication date:
February 2009
Summary:
This paper analyzes whether Congress can legislate a health insurance mandate and the potential legal challenges that might arise, given such a mandate.
Executive Authority to Reform Health: Options and Limitations
By:
Chugh M
Publication date:
March 2009
Summary:
This paper explores the scope and limits of President Barack Obama's ability to invoke his executive authority to reform health care. Specifically, it identifies ways the Obama administration can use directives to: (1) expand Medicaid and SCHIP coverage through...
Georgetown O'Neill Institute
Publication date:
Jan 1, 2008
Summary:
Georgetown University O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law trains leaders in health law and policy, produces innovative and significant research and fosters development of policy designed to protect and promote the health of people around the world....