>> More...
Published: Sep 03, 2008
Initiatives at state and federal levels to reduce medical errors are receiving more attention from health policy-makers. This article provides an overview of state-level initiatives to improve patient safety that rely on voluntary reporting of medical errors. The article also discusses the status of a new federal law encouraging development of voluntary reporting initiatives, the 2005 Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA). Much of the drive for these initiatives stems from the need to address the chilling effect that the current U.S. legal system has on providers’ willingness to disclose errors.
More than half of states have a mandatory adverse-event reporting system in place. Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Massachusettes, New York, Oregon and Pennsylvania all have patient safety organizations, most of which have some kind of reporting system. The authors outline the existing system in each of these states, in order that other states seeking to put new safety organizations in place have available a systematic description of the structure and function of these organizations.
The PSQIA is an attempt by federal policy-makers to encourage ‘voluntary, provider-driven approaches’ to improving patient safety. In its first two years, PSQIA has fostered 50–100 entities seeking to become patient safety organizations (PSOs). Two other primary goals of the PSQIA are to address providers’ fears that reporting errors will be held against them, and to gather data about medical errors.
This article also discusses some of the plans put forward to remove medical liability claims from the tort system. The authors propose an alternative approach involving PSOs making available a process that involves elements of an administration (i.e., nontort) compensation proposal, but that would be voluntary for patients and providers. Such plans could be financed, in part, through funds saved by not relying entirely on the tort system—a wasteful and expensive method of dealing with medical errors—to address these issues.
Listed below is one grant that supported this project.
| Grant | Awarded to | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Designing a reliable system of medical justice |
Common Good Institute Inc. (New York, NY) ID#: 58662 http://www.commongood.org |
Approved award: $994,560 Actual award: $976,172 February 2007 to September 2009 This grant has ended. |
RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.
Common Good and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to Expand Initiative to Promote Health Courts
Publication date:
Feb 20, 2007
Summary:
Common Good, the national nonpartisan legal reform coalition, has been awarded a two-year grant of nearly $1 million from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) to promote the creation of special health courts to handle medical injury disputes in six states. The...
"Health Courts" and Accountability for Patient Safety
By:
Mello MM, Studdert DM, Kachalia AB and Brennan TA
Publication date:
September 2006
Summary:
The authors compare various designs for health court systems and endorse a smaller scale demonstration project.
Administrative "Health Courts" for Medical Injury Claims
By:
Elliott ED, Narayan SA and Nasmith MS
Publication date:
August 2008
Summary:
Renewed proposals for the adoption of an administrative compensation system for medical injury claims inspired these authors to examine whether such a reform is constitutional according to federal law and to consider the issues in their historical context.
Health Courts, Administrative Compensation and Patient Safety: Research, Policy and Practice
Publication date:
November 01, 2007
Summary:
The fourth in a series of national forums sponsored by RWJF discussed patient-safety focused alternatives to the current medical liability system and received feedback from key stakeholders.
Health Courts: An Alternative for Resolving Medical Liability Claims: Research Highlight
By:
Necochea L
Publication date:
Oct 30, 2006
Summary:
The shortcomings of the medical tort system are widely acknowledged and have prompted substantial interest in medical liability reform. This Research Highlight covers an article describing a model for an alternative administrative compensation system featuring...
Michelle Mello Podcast on Health Courts
By:
Mello M
Publication date:
August 24, 2007
Summary:
In this podcast, Michelle Mello of the Harvard School of Public Health discusses health courts as an alternative to the current tort system for medical malpractice issues.
Health Courts: An Alternative for Resolving Medical Liability Claims
Publication date:
September 21, 2006
Summary:
New RWJF-funded research describes a model for an alternative administrative compensation system and explains its advantages over the tort system
Health Courts Offer a New Approach
Publication date:
December 29, 2006
Summary:
The many drawbacks of the medical tort system are stimulating interest in health courts as a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to the current medical malpractice claims system
The Pioneer Portfolio has launched Pioneering Ideas, a blog for RWJF staff, grantees and other innovators to share breakthrough ideas for health and health care. Here are several recent entries: