Error Reporting and Injury Compensation

Advancing Patient Safety Through a State Patient Safety Organization

By: Barringer PJ and Kachalia AB

In: Wyoming Law Review, 8(2), pp.349-371

Publisher: University of Wyoming

Published: Sep 03, 2008

Get full text or downloads

Initiatives at state and federal levels to reduce medical errors are receiving more attention from health policy-makers. This article provides an overview of state-level initiatives to improve patient safety that rely on voluntary reporting of medical errors. The article also discusses the status of a new federal law encouraging development of voluntary reporting initiatives, the 2005 Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA). Much of the drive for these initiatives stems from the need to address the chilling effect that the current U.S. legal system has on providers’ willingness to disclose errors.

More than half of states have a mandatory adverse-event reporting system in place. Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Massachusettes, New York, Oregon and Pennsylvania all have patient safety organizations, most of which have some kind of reporting system. The authors outline the existing system in each of these states, in order that other states seeking to put new safety organizations in place have available a systematic description of the structure and function of these organizations.

The PSQIA is an attempt by federal policy-makers to encourage ‘voluntary, provider-driven approaches’ to improving patient safety. In its first two years, PSQIA has fostered 50–100 entities seeking to become patient safety organizations (PSOs). Two other primary goals of the PSQIA are to address providers’ fears that reporting errors will be held against them, and to gather data about medical errors.

This article also discusses some of the plans put forward to remove medical liability claims from the tort system. The authors propose an alternative approach involving PSOs making available a process that involves elements of an administration (i.e., nontort) compensation proposal, but that would be voluntary for patients and providers. Such plans could be financed, in part, through funds saved by not relying entirely on the tort system—a wasteful and expensive method of dealing with medical errors—to address these issues.


Tags:

Share:
Share

Listed below is one grant that supported this project.

Grant Awarded to Amount
Designing a reliable system of medical justice Common Good Institute Inc. (New York, NY)
ID#: 58662

http://www.commongood.org
Approved award: $994,560
Actual award: $976,172
February 2007 to September 2009
This grant has ended.

RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.

Close

Common Good and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to Expand Initiative to Promote Health Courts

Publication date:
Feb 20, 2007

Summary:
Common Good, the national nonpartisan legal reform coalition, has been awarded a two-year grant of nearly $1 million from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) to promote the creation of special health courts to handle medical injury disputes in six states. The...

Close

"Health Courts" and Accountability for Patient Safety

By:
Mello MM, Studdert DM, Kachalia AB and Brennan TA

Publication date:
September 2006

Summary:
The authors compare various designs for health court systems and endorse a smaller scale demonstration project.

Close

Administrative "Health Courts" for Medical Injury Claims

By:
Elliott ED, Narayan SA and Nasmith MS

Publication date:
August 2008

Summary:
Renewed proposals for the adoption of an administrative compensation system for medical injury claims inspired these authors to examine whether such a reform is constitutional according to federal law and to consider the issues in their historical context.

Close

Health Courts, Administrative Compensation and Patient Safety: Research, Policy and Practice

Publication date:
November 01, 2007

Summary:
The fourth in a series of national forums sponsored by RWJF discussed patient-safety focused alternatives to the current medical liability system and received feedback from key stakeholders.

Close

Health Courts: An Alternative for Resolving Medical Liability Claims: Research Highlight

By:
Necochea L

Publication date:
Oct 30, 2006

Summary:
The shortcomings of the medical tort system are widely acknowledged and have prompted substantial interest in medical liability reform. This Research Highlight covers an article describing a model for an alternative administrative compensation system featuring...

Close

Michelle Mello Podcast on Health Courts

By:
Mello M

Publication date:
August 24, 2007

Summary:
In this podcast, Michelle Mello of the Harvard School of Public Health discusses health courts as an alternative to the current tort system for medical malpractice issues.

Close

Health Courts: An Alternative for Resolving Medical Liability Claims

Publication date:
September 21, 2006

Summary:
New RWJF-funded research describes a model for an alternative administrative compensation system and explains its advantages over the tort system

Close

Health Courts Offer a New Approach

Publication date:
December 29, 2006

Summary:
The many drawbacks of the medical tort system are stimulating interest in health courts as a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to the current medical malpractice claims system

My presentation builder (beta)

You have not collected any slides or slideshows for your presentation. Learn more about the presentation builder and search for slides on our Web site.