RAND Analysis of California's Proposition 36, Which Provides Drug Treatment Instead of Jail Time to Non-Violent Drug-Possession Offenders, Shows No Increase in Crime

Published: Jul 31, 2007

Get full text or downloads

  • Grant Results Report

Researchers at RAND Corp., led by Martin Y. Iguchi, Ph.D., studied the implementation of California's Proposition 36, a program that diverts people convicted of nonviolent drug-possession offenses from incarceration to parole with drug treatment. Orange County, Calif., served as the study site.

The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) national Substance Abuse Policy Research Program (SAPRP) (for more information see Grant Results).

Key Findings

  • Overall, results suggest that there has been no overwhelming change in the aggregate level of crime committed in Orange County as a result of Proposition 36. However, further research is required to confirm these results.

Funding
RWJF supported the project with a solicited grant of $253,817 between February 2002 and July 2004.

Tags:

Share:
Share

There are currently no additional readings for this publication.


Listed below is one grant that supported this project.

Grant Awarded to Amount
Research on the implementation and impact of California's Proposition 36, a diversion program for non-violent, drug-possession offenders Rand Corporation (Santa Monica, CA)
ID#: 044121
Martin Y. Iguchi, Ph.D.
310-206-6019
iguchi@ucla.edu
http://www.rand.org
Approved award: $264,124
Actual award: $253,817
February 2002 to July 2004

RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.

My presentation builder (beta)

You have not collected any slides or slideshows for your presentation. Learn more about the presentation builder and search for slides on our Web site.