>> More...
Published: Jan 25, 2007
Two grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), made in concert with funding from the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Ford Foundation provided partial funding for the creation and operating expenses of the Corporation for Supportive Housing (CSH). A third grant supported an evaluation of CSH. In all, CSH raised $95.2 million from public and private sources from 1991–1999.
Supportive housing is permanent housing that combines health and social services for homeless people suffering from chronic health problems, mental and physical disabilities, and/or substance abuse problems.
Key Results
The Evaluation
An initial evaluation (ID# PC332) co-funded by Pew, found that CSH had become a respected and influential player in the field.
Pew and The Rockefeller Foundation co-funded a second phase of the evaluation, while RWJF funded an assessment of the feasibility of conducting a cost study of supportive housing (ID# 027390).
In addition, under its Building Health Systems for People with Chronic Illnesses national program, RWJF funded CSH to develop a unique and replicable model for the delivery and financing of integrated services (see Grant Results on ID# 027072).
Funding
RWJF supported the project with two grants to the Corporation for Supportive Housing totaling $8 million, and a $148,002 grant to Holt, Wexler, and Merchant for the evaluation.
There are currently no additional readings for this publication.
Listed below is one grant that supported this project.
| Grant | Awarded to | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Meeting health and shelter needs of homeless chronically ill people |
Corporation for Supportive Housing (New York, NY) ID#: 019309 James A. Krauskopf 212-986-2966 http://www.csh.org/ |
Actual award: $4,000,000 January 1995 to December 1999 |
RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.
Grant Results Reports
RWJF produces Grant Results reports on its funded initiatives. External writers and editors read the entire grant to prepare each report, which is then reviewed by RWJF staff and by the director of the initiative. Any reviewer in the chain may ask for changes in the report to improve clarity or accuracy.
Read more about our approach.