>> More...
Published: Sep 01, 2002
From 1996 to 2001, staff at Vanderbilt University Medical Center implemented and evaluated a model program to identify and intervene with health care providers at high risk of generating malpractice claims.
In the project, researchers identified physicians — at Vanderbilt and at four community hospitals in Alabama — who had generated a high level of complaints. They randomly assigned them to either an intervention group that received counseling from mentor physicians or to a control group that received no counseling.
The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) Improving Malpractice Prevention and Compensation Systems national program.
Key Results
Key Findings
Preliminary evaluation findings indicated that:
Funding
RWJF supported this project through a two grants totaling $1,365,592.
There are currently no additional readings for this publication.
Listed below are 2 of the grants that supported this project, totaling $1,364,835.
| Grant | Awarded to | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Early identification and response model for malpractice prevention |
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN) ID#: 028592 Gerald B. Hickson, M.D. 615-343-4500 gerald.hickson@Vanderbilt.Edu http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu |
Approved award: $667,291 Actual award: $646,855 January 1996 to December 2001 |
| Early identification and response model for malpractice prevention |
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN) ID#: 033572 Gerald B. Hickson, M.D. 615-343-4500 gerald.hickson@Vanderbilt.Edu http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu |
Approved award: $717,983 Actual award: $717,980 January 1998 to June 2003 |
RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.
View resources and information on health care quality.
Grant Results Reports
RWJF produces Grant Results reports on its funded initiatives. External writers and editors read the entire grant to prepare each report, which is then reviewed by RWJF staff and by the director of the initiative. Any reviewer in the chain may ask for changes in the report to improve clarity or accuracy.
Read more about our approach.