>> More...
Published: Oct 15, 2004
From 1996 to 1999, researchers at Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi oversaw a consortium of health care interests in a 15-county region of southern Texas that developed a predictive model to identify the area's future nursing care needs and helped initiate improvements in the region's nursing education system, including an online nursing curriculum.
The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) national program Colleagues in Caring: Regional Collaboratives for Nursing Work Force Development.
Licensure-based data from the state Board of Nurse Examiners provided information on the region's active nursing workforce. Combining these various data with Geographic Information System (GIS) technology, consortium personnel developed predictive health-risk GIS models that could project future health care trends and nursing needs in the region.
Key Results
Funding
RWJF supported the project with two grants totaling $349,915 between July 1996 and June 2002.
There are currently no additional readings for this publication.
Listed below are 2 of the grants that supported this project, totaling $349,915.
| Grant | Awarded to | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Colleagues in Caring: Regional Collaboratives for Nursing Work Force Development |
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (Corpus Christi, TX) ID#: 029463 Claudia L. Johnston, Ph.D., R.N. 361-825-2712 johnston@falcon.tamucc.edu |
Approved award: $200,000 Actual award: $199,915 July 1996 to June 1999 |
| Colleagues in Caring: Regional Collaboratives for Nursing Work Force Development (phase 2) |
Texas A&M Research Foundation (College Station, TX) ID#: 036978 Claudia L. Johnston, Ph.D., R.N. 361-825-2712 johnston@falcon.tamucc.edu http://rf-web.tamu.edu |
Actual award: $150,000 July 1999 to June 2002 |
RWJF may have supported this project with other grants that are not listed.
View resources and information on health care quality.
Grant Results Reports
RWJF produces Grant Results reports on its funded initiatives. External writers and editors read the entire grant to prepare each report, which is then reviewed by RWJF staff and by the director of the initiative. Any reviewer in the chain may ask for changes in the report to improve clarity or accuracy.
Read more about our approach.