>> More...
Published: May 01, 2003
In 1990, the Alum Rock Counseling Center, a private, nonprofit corporation that provides counseling, training and educational services in Santa Clara County, Calif., worked to develop a project, Join Together, designed to significantly reduce illegal drug use and alcohol abuse on the East Side of San Jose, Calif.
This planning project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) national program, Fighting Back®: Community Initiatives to Reduce Demand for Illegal Drugs and Alcohol.
Key Results and Conclusions
Both the RWJF program officer and the National Program Office of Fighting Back expressed doubt that San Jose Together could become an integrated program under its proposed organizational structure.
The structure featured an executive advisory committee, a governing team, various working groups and a project review committee-each of which was insulated from the others.
Therefore RWJF did not make an implementation grant under the Fighting Back program.
The Problem
San Jose, Calif., was the most racially and ethnically diverse area in Santa Clara county in the late 1980s:
In the late 1980s, the sale and use of drugs and alcohol on the East Side rose sharply, with narcotics incidents increasing 12.5 percent per year from 1985 to 1987, according to the San Jose Police Department.
The Planning Project
After the Grant
After the planning grant ended, San Jose Together evolved into San Jose BEST (Bring Everyone's Strengths Together), a program designed to address the problems of youth violence and gang activities.
BEST was a focus on providing prevention, intervention and suppression services to reduce gang activity, was coordinated by the Mayor's Gang Prevention Task Force.
Funding
RWJF provided a $199,996 planning grant to support the project from 1990 to 1992.
There are currently no additional readings for this publication.
Grant Results Reports
RWJF produces Grant Results reports on its funded initiatives. External writers and editors read the entire grant to prepare each report, which is then reviewed by RWJF staff and by the director of the initiative. Any reviewer in the chain may ask for changes in the report to improve clarity or accuracy.
Read more about our approach.