 Favorites |
 Google |
 Digg |
 Del.icio.us |
 Twitter |
 Facebook |
>> More...
Changes to the Tax Exclusion of Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Premiums: A Potential Source of Financing for Health Reform
Timely analysis of immediate health policy issues.
Published: June 25, 2009
One of the challenges that Congress will face as it considers major health reform legislation this year will be identifying the necessary financing. Many have suggested that reducing or eliminating the tax exclusion of employer-sponsored health insurance (ESI) could generate significant additional tax revenue to fund expansions in health insurance coverage.
This paper focuses on two specific policy design elements:
- a cap, or dollar limit, on the amount of employer-sponsored health insurance premiums excluded from taxable income; and
- an index that determines how this cap might grow over time.
Researchers from the Urban Institute demonstrate that limiting the ESI tax exclusion could be an important component of financing health reform. The extent of the impact on overall health care costs depends, in part, on whether this causes employees to demand plans that are less expensive in order to keep their premium under a cap, or whether employees are likely to accept a plan with a higher premium even if some portion of the premium is taxed. Any effects on cost growth would likely be modest, given that the vast majority of the current tax exclusion would remain in place. In any case, limiting the tax exclusion would not only provide funding for health reform but would also mitigate the huge inequities built into the current treatment of employer contributions to premiums.
Share:
Recommended
- Health Coverage Tax Credits: A Small Program Offering Large Policy Lessons (Issue and policy briefs)
- Health Insurance Coverage of Young Adults (Issue and policy briefs)
- High Costs, Low Incomes and SCHIP Reauthorization (Issue and policy briefs)
- SCHIP Reauthorization: How Will Low-Income Kids Benefit Under House and Senate Bills? (Issue and policy briefs)
- Eligible But Not Enrolled: How SCHIP Reauthorization Can Help (Issue and policy briefs)
- Concerns About Parents Dropping Employer Coverage to Enroll in SCHIP Overlook Issues of Affordability (Issue and policy briefs)
- Show more
Related Web sites
Health Coverage Tax Credits: A Small Program Offering Large Policy Lessons
By:
Dorn S
Publication date:
Feb 5, 2008
Summary:
This Urban Institute policy brief analyzes how current tax credits can be restructured to reach more workers who qualify and how future tax credits could be designed to serve millions of uninsured Americans more effectively.
Health Insurance Coverage of Young Adults
Publication date:
June 2008
Summary:
An Urban Institute analysis looks at why young adults, accounting for 28 percent of America's uninsured population, are disproportionately uninsured and what policies could address their coverage gaps.
High Costs, Low Incomes and SCHIP Reauthorization
By:
Kenney G and Pelletier J
Publication date:
January 12, 2009
Summary:
This Urban Institute analysis compares current costs of living and costs of employer-sponsored insurance with figures from a decade ago.
SCHIP Reauthorization: How Will Low-Income Kids Benefit Under House and Senate Bills?
By:
Kenney G, Cook A and Pelletier J
Publication date:
September 18, 2007
Summary:
This policy brief discusses findings from empirical work examining the likely income distribution of children who would gain and/or retain health insurance coverage through the proposed Senate and House SCHIP bills.
Eligible But Not Enrolled: How SCHIP Reauthorization Can Help
By:
Dorn S and The Urban Institute
Publication date:
September 29, 2007
Summary:
According to an analysis from the Urban Institute, SCHIP reauthorization could give states the flexibility to draw on lessons from strategies recently developed by Medicare for providing Medicaid and SCHIP to eligible low-income kids.
Concerns About Parents Dropping Employer Coverage to Enroll in SCHIP Overlook Issues of Affordability
By:
Zuckerman S, Perry C and The Urban Institute
Publication date:
October 02, 2007
Summary:
The analysis from the Urban Institute documents that low-income families have difficulty affording employer-sponsored insurance when measured on CMS' affordability scale and that by limiting premiums and other out-of-pocket spending, Medicaid and SCHIP make health care...
Can the President's Health Care Tax Proposal Serve as an Effective Substitute for SCHIP Expansion?
By:
Blumberg L, The Urban Institute and Perry C
Publication date:
October 12, 2007
Summary:
Nearly 40 percent of a low-income family's earnings will need to be spent on health insurance if a Bush administration proposal to use the tax system to subsidize coverage is enacted, a new Urban Institute analysis has found.
Massachusetts Health Reform: Solving the Long-Run Cost Problem
Publication date:
January 14, 2009
Summary:
In a new analysis by the Urban Institute, researchers John Holahan and Linda Blumberg summarize the state???s accomplishments, examine the challenges, and suggest four options for addressing long-term costs.