Some medical practices in Minnesota screened only 15 percent of their patients for colon cancer, while others screened 97 percent.
Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports, worked with three regional alliances that promote health care quality to develop and publish credible ratings of groups of physicians.
Dates of Project: November 2011 through June 2013
Description: Each alliance gathered information from physician groups using measures of health care quality the alliance had developed. Statisticians, medical staff, and journalists at Consumers Union then worked with the alliances to analyze the information, turn it into ratings, and agree on how to present them.
The alliances—Massachusetts Health Quality Partners, Minnesota Community Measurement, and the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality—are among 16 participating in Aligning Forces for Quality, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
In 2012 and 2013, Consumer Reports published ratings of groups of physicians in each region, focusing on arenas each had chosen, such as patients’ experiences with physicians, and the record of physician groups in screening for cancer and controlling chronic diseases such as diabetes.
In March 2013, Consumer Reports published an article on which types of cancer screening consumers should get and which they should avoid. The article revealed wide variations in testing for colon cancer—one of the most effective screens—among medical practices in Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.
Consumers Union and the regional alliances used multiple formats to disseminate the reports to employers, consumer organizations, health plans, state agencies, and pharmacies.
Half of consumers who read the inserts in Consumer Reports said they would share the ratings with family and friends, and 20 percent said they would speak to their doctor about them.
Consumer Reports teams with alliances in Massachusetts, Minnesota & Wisconsin to rate groups of physicians.
- Doctor Performance Gets a Checkup
- If Consumers and Purchasers Could Compare Health Care Quality, What Would It Do to Health Care?
- The Aligning Forces For Quality Experience
- Consumer Beliefs and Use of Information about Health Care Cost, Resource Use, and Value
- Physicians' Views of Comparative Information on Costs and Resource Use
- Producing Public Reports of Physician Quality at the Community Level
- Reform in Action: Can Publicly Reporting the Performance of Health Care Providers Spur Quality Improvement?
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Progress and lessons learned from two programs that seek to advance the impact digital games can have on health.
Joint Commission Resources in Oak Brook Ill., oversaw development and testing of an online course and support materials to improve communica...
The rapid rise of antibiotic resistance can be tracked using ResistanceMap, an online tool that visually highlights regions of the country w...
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
This poll shows most Americans believe the quality of U.S. health care is average at best. More than half of American adults surveyed barely...
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.
Health care reform may create incentives to spur the growth in HDHPs and CDHPs, a move that might help hold costs down?at least for a time.
The authors suggest repairing the health care system by realigning provider incentives, increasing the availability of information with whic...
While the ACA is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provi...