Dates of Project: 2002 to 2010
Field of Work: History of the debate over the right to medical treatment in the United States
Problem Synopsis: Unlike citizens of other developed nations, Americans do not have a constitutional or legal right to health care. Yet advocates have established various rights to health care for particular conditions. Despite that history, no one had published research specifically devoted to health care rights and rationing in the United States.
“The history of American health care is a history of rationing, mostly based on ability to pay.”—Beatrix Hoffman, PhD
Synopsis of the Work: Hoffman investigated how medical professionals, patients, government officials, advocates, and the public have talked about a right to medical treatment, and how that debate has affected public policy and medical practice. After receiving an RWJF Investigator Award in 2001, she visited 28 historical archives around the nation, seeking to “find evidence of ordinary Americans’ experiences in the health care system.”
Key Findings and Conclusions: Hoffman published her findings in a book, three articles, and five book chapters. Those findings include:
- “The history of American health care is the history of unequal access. Every time an expansion occurred, it was accompanied by limitations, especially limitations on treating health care as a right.”
- The history of American health care is also a history of rationing, mostly based on ability to pay but sometimes based on other criteria.
- Mandatory emergency room care doesn’t really mean treatment. Patients have to be examined and stabilized. It’s not a universal right to health care.
- U.S. social movements around health care have tended to focus on single issues or constituencies, such as AIDS or breast cancer, rather than universal access.
“Health care for undocumented immigrants has reflected a tension between sympathy for them and a desire to exclude them.”—Beatrix Hoffman, PhD
RWJF Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, RWJF Investigator Awards in Health Policy ResearchRead the Program Results for RWJF Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research
- About this grant
RWJF Investigator states, "The history of American health care is the history of unequal access."
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.
As smartphone technology becomes ever more ubiquitous and the dangers of tobacco become ever more apparent, it’s not surprising that there a...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
NewPublicHealth spoke with the Julio Frenk, MD, MPH, PHD, Dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, about how public health has changed o...
This series of issues present key lessons learned by regional alliances of clinicians, patients, and payers in Aligning Forces for Quality c...