Small but measurable gains—stemming the tide of decline relative to other distressed cities—were a great outcome, given…the depth and breadth of the problems.”—Evaluator Beth Weitzman, PhD
“This was going to be the biggest deal since Head Start—it was going to transform these places.”—James Knickman, PhD, RWJF
Dates of Program: 1996–2005
Field of Work: Improving child health and safety outcomes in urban America through comprehensive reform of local decision-making and funding systems.
Problem Synopsis: In 1992, the acquittal of four Los Angeles police officers charged in the videotaped beating of Rodney King, a Black motorist stopped after a high-speed car chase, sparked riots. The six days of death and destruction forced institutions across the country, including philanthropies, to reexamine their efforts to address the complex problems of big cities.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation concluded that while it had made numerous grants to urban organizations, relatively few had gone to the nation’s largest cities—and those that had were of insufficient size and duration to have an appreciable effect on the huge health challenges confronting major urban centers.
Synopsis of the Work: In response, RWJF launched a 10-year initiative in five cities to define the community’s most pressing child health and safety problems and marshal public and private resources to address them. The aim was to implement new strategies, policies, and funding mechanisms on a scale large enough to change child health and safety statistics citywide.
The five cities—Baltimore; Detroit; Oakland, Calif.; Philadelphia; and Richmond, Va.—took different approaches. However, all worked to expand participation in after-school programs. Improving preschool care, strengthening home visitation programs, and increasing support for youth at risk for violence were among the other strategies.
Key Findings and Results: An evaluation team from New York University led by Beth Weitzman, PhD, compared outcomes in the five cities against those in nine cities with matching demographics. The researchers based their analysis on site visits, household surveys, and government data on child health and safety.
They found that the five cities made some measurable gains relative to the comparison cities—but that the gains were small. “Judged by the ambitious expectations of its designers, the impacts of [the program] fall short,” the evaluators wrote in the American Journal of Evaluation. The evaluation won the 2010 award for best evaluation from the American Evaluation Association
The national program office took a more upbeat view. Headed by former Seattle Mayor Charles Royer, it reported that four of the five cities “either achieved scale in one or more of their strategies, or demonstrated that they were on a trajectory to reach scale within a reasonable period of time.”
According to the national program office:
- The sites together leveraged more than $200 million in annual support for their strategies.
- The four sites on track to reach scale “secured major meaningful system reforms that changed policies” to support site strategies.
- Four of the five sites “markedly improved the ability of their cities to secure, analyze, and utilize data” in decision-making related to policies and investments that affect children.
The program changed how leaders in the five cities thought about children’s health, and gave them new tools for making health-related policies.”—Evaluator Beth Weitzman, PhD
Report examines 10-year, $63 million program to improve health outcomes for children in 5 major US cities
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
CDC: Measles Remains a Threat to U.S. Health Security - HHS: $55.5M to Strengthen Training of U.S. Health Professionals, Especially in Nursi...
A conference in St. Paul, Minnesota earlier this month examined ideas and emerging examples for building a healthier Minnesota by promoting ...
Janet Tomiyama was recently named the 2013 recipient of the Early Career Investigator Award from the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
RWJF announced winners to the AF4Q Games to Generate Data Challenge and the Hospital Price Transparency challenge at Health 2.0's fall confe...