This research was not funded directly by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), but has been included as an additional resource to this issue of Tobacco Control supported by RWJF.
"One option that deserves more attention is the enactment of local or national bans on the sale of cigarettes. There are precedents: 15 US states enacted bans on the sale of cigarettes from 1890 to 1927, for instance, and such laws are still fully within the power of local communities and state governments. Apart from reducing human suffering, abolishing the sale of cigarettes would result in savings in the realm of healthcare costs, increased labour productivity, lessened harms from fires, reduced consumption of scarce physical resources, and a smaller global carbon footprint. Abolition would also put a halt to one of the principal sources of corruption in modern civilisation, and would effectively eliminate one of the historical forces behind global warming denial and environmental obfuscation."
—Excerpted from a special supplement of Tobacco Control.
- 1 Questions For a Tobacco-Free Future
- 2 Minimising the Harm from Nicotine Use
- 3 Supply-Side Options for an Endgame for the Tobacco Industry
- 4 Reducing the Nicotine Content to Make Cigarettes Less Addictive
- 5 Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of an Endgame Strategy
- 6 The Tobacco-Free Generation Proposal
- 7 Why Ban the Sale of Cigarettes?
- 8 Ending Versus Controlling Versus Employing Addiction in the Tobacco-Caused Disease Endgame
- 9 Large-Scale Unassisted Smoking Cessation Over 50 Years
- 10 Ending Tobacco-Caused Mortality and Morbidity
- 11 There's No Single Endgame
- 12 Reflections on the "Endgame" for Tobacco Control
- 13 Tobacco Endgames
- 14 The FCTC's Evidence-Based Policies Remain A Key to Ending the Tobacco Epidemic
- 15 Cultivating the Next Generation of Tobacco Endgame Advocates
- 16 Can Tobacco Control Endgame Analysis Learn Anything From the U.S. Experience With Illegal Drugs?
- 17 Political Impediments to a Tobacco End-Game
- 18 Tobacco Endgame Strategies
- 19 In and Across Bureaucracy
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
A new study finds healthier school meals standards could mean lower obesity rates among lower-income children. Read a Q&A with the author.
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.