Field of Work: Evaluating state expansion of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Problem Synopsis: Before 2006, children of families with incomes above 200 percent of the federal poverty level were not eligible for CHIP. The high cost of private health insurance meant that children in these families often went uninsured.
Synopsis of the Work: Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Washington were among the first states to expand CHIP to children of families who exceeded that income guideline. From 2008 through 2010, researchers at the University of California-Los Angeles and the RAND Corp. evaluated the impact of these eligibility expansions on the coverage and affordability of health insurance for children and families.
The researchers specifically evaluated how states determined how much families had to pay for CHIP coverage, and the percentage of their incomes these payments represented.
Key Findings: Findings were published in an article and issue brief:
- Although affordability was a key factor in states' decisions regarding premiums for CHIP, officials also considered historical precedent, fiscal viability, premiums paid by public-sector employees, and simplicity. Officials also tried to avoid "crowd-out" of private insurance coverage.
- The percentage of their incomes families paid for CHIP coverage under the expanded programs varied substantially across the three states.
- For families earning less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level, family coverage through an exchange—created under the federal Affordable Care Act—is likely to be more affordable than a combination of CHIP and private insurance.
- Evidence that the states' efforts reduced the number of uninsured children was somewhat ambiguous.
State Health Access Reform Evaluation Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, State Health Access Reform EvaluationRead the Program Results for State Health Access Reform Evaluation
- About this grant
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
As smartphone technology becomes ever more ubiquitous and the dangers of tobacco become ever more apparent, it’s not surprising that there a...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
NewPublicHealth spoke with the Julio Frenk, MD, MPH, PHD, Dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, about how public health has changed o...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
A growing network of leaders in research, policy and practice are leading the way in preventing adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and mit...
MTV executives are attempting to mollify nurses and nursing allies who are outraged over a salacious new “reality” television show about a g...
FDA: Certain HeartStart AEDs May Not Work During Cardiac Emergencies - NHTSA: Motorcoaches, Large Buses to Require Seatbelts for All Passeng...