Regionalization of public health preparedness and response refers to the development of public health systems that span the different regions of a metropolitan area.
In this article, four collaborative case studies that focused on the Washington metropolitan area, or National Capital Region (NCR), were described. The goals of the case studies were to investigate the configuration and impact of regional public health structures on preparedness and response. The data collected encompassed the work experience of the first author, observations, document review, and interviews with 19 health officials and other individuals in the NCR.
- Although the Washington metropolitan region is referred to as the NCR, there was no official regional public health structure in the area.
- Most public health preparedness and response efforts among local and state health departments and public health partners, such as nongovernmental organizations, in the NCR were informal in nature and sustained voluntarily.
- The major challenge identified to regionalization of public health preparedness and response was determining how to integrate the federal government and its agencies in such efforts.
A lack of a formal structure and ongoing questions as to the role of the federal government characterized public health regionalization efforts in the Washington metropolitan area.
- 1. The Ongoing Quality Improvement Journey
- 2. A Road Map for Improving the Performance of Performance Measures
- 3. The Trade-Off Among Quality, Quantity, and Cost
- 4. Global Trigger Tool' Shows that Adverse Events in Hospitals May be Ten Times Greater Than Previously Measured
- 5. Preventing Bloodstream Infections
- 6. Measuring the Performance of Individual Physicians by Collecting Data from Multiple Health Plans
- 7. Measuring Health Care Performance Now, Not Tomorrow
- 8. Despite Improved Quality of Care in the Veterans Affairs Health System, Racial Disparity Persists for Important Clinical Outcomes
- 9. The Importance of Transitional Care in Achieving Health Reform
- 10. An Early Status Report on the Beacon Communities' Plans for Transformation Via Health Information Technology
- 11. A Comparative Study of 11 Local Health Department Organizational Networks
- 12. Public Health Performance
- 13. A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness
- 14. Public Health Delivery Systems
- 15. Regionalization in Local Public Health Systems
- 16. Public Health Services and Systems Research
- 17. A Shot in the Rear, Not a Shot in the Dark
- 18. What Predicts Local Public Health Agency Performance Improvement?
- 19. Growth of a Scientific Community of Practice
- 20. Evolution of Coauthorship in Public Health Services and Systems Research
- 21. Resources that May Matter
- 22. Evidence Links Increases in Public Health Spending to Declines in Preventable Deaths
- 23. Public Health Financial Management Competencies
- 24. Decision Science
- 25. Public Health Financial Management Needs
- 26. Data-Driven Management Strategies in Public Health Collaboratives
- 27. Using Geographic Information Systems to Match Local Health Needs with Public Health Services and Programs
- 28. Public Health Systems and Services Research
- 29. Local Public Health Capacities to Address the Needs of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations
- 30. A Needs Assessment for Data and Methods in Public Health Systems Research
- 31. Mapping the Multidisciplinary Field of Public Health Services and Systems Research
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.