Some have argued that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) would erode employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) by providing incentives for employers to stop offering coverage. Others have claimed that most businesses would face increased costs as a result of reform, or even that the uncertainties surrounding the impact of health reform are hampering the economic recovery. A new study, however, finds that the effects on employer coverage and employer health care spending would actually be small.
The paper, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and prepared by Urban Institute researchers using their Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model, estimates how the ACA would affect ESI and employer costs. To investigate the effects of health reform on ESI, they simulate the ACA as if fully implemented in 2010 and contrast the results with the pre-reform baseline estimates for the year.
Among the researchers’ findings:
- Overall ESI coverage under the ACA would not differ significantly from what coverage would be without reform.
- Total employer spending on premium contributions, assessments and vouchers would be 0.6 percent lower under the ACA than without reform. Total spending by small firms would be 8.7 percent lower, mainly due to cost savings from the new exchanges. Spending by medium-sized firms would increase by 11.8 percent, because some would offer new coverage and others would be required to pay assessments. Large firms’ spending would be largely unaffected.
- The average employer contribution per person covered by ESI would decrease by 7.9 percent for small firms, 1.1 percent for medium-sized firms and 3.1 percent for large firms.
- In the absence of health reform, ESI coverage would fall by 2.6 percentage points in five years, assuming 5 percent annual growth in private premiums, and by 7.6 percentage points with 8 percent annual growth in premiums. Provisions of the ACA could moderate this long-term trend.
The brief’s finding that the ACA will have little overall effect on ESI coverage is similar to the findings of the Congressional Budget Office and runs counter to some predictions of a major decline in ESI because of the ACA.
Urban Institute Real Time Policy Analysis
These reports, also called "quick strikes," are a series of timely briefings examining a wide variety health insurance coverage issues in the United States.Learn more about the series
- About this grant
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
MTV executives are attempting to mollify nurses and nursing allies who are outraged over a salacious new “reality” television show about a g...
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.