This article describes the work of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other national research organizations to support research on the social determinants of health. The NIH is building a more robust social determinants research agenda through a broad range of research programs.
- NIH guidelines on research encourage inclusion of women, minorities and children in research to provide better information on health disparities and interventions. NIH researchers are asked to study the developmental origins of health disparities; improve the science of dissemination of findings on health disparities; develop methodologies to track changes in underserved communities; and strengthen partnerships between community-based research organizations.
- The establishment of the NIH National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (now the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIMHD) was a crucial step to improve research on social determinants of health.
- NIMHD launched the Community-Based Participatory Research Initiative, which uses research to advance community partnerships. This initiative, broken into three phases, develops community partnerships, funds interventional research, and sponsors efforts to target health disparities in underserved populations.
- The Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research has developed funding opportunities to support behavioral and social science research on health disparities.
- The Basic Behavioral and Social Science Opportunity Network (OppNet), a recently created trans-NIH collaboration, sponsors research on mechanisms of behavior and its interactions with environment and biology.
A better understanding of the social determinants of health is key to understanding and eliminating health disparities in the United States. The NIH has an ambitious research plan to learn more about social determinants and to design effective interventions that narrow health disparities.
- 1. Strong Medicine for a Healthier America
- 2. Broadening the Focus
- 3. Healthy Starts for All
- 4. Citizen-Centered Health Promotion
- 5. Healthy Homes and Communities
- 6. When Do We Know Enough to Recommend Action on the Social Determinants of Health?
- 7. The Economic Value of Improving the Health of Disadvantaged Americans
- 8. Improving Health
- 9. To Improve Health, Don't Follow the Money
- 10. Moving on Upstream
- 11. Businesses as Partners to Improve Community Health
- 12. Strengthening the Public Research Agenda for Social Determinants of Health
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Progress and lessons learned from two programs that seek to advance the impact digital games can have on health.
Joint Commission Resources in Oak Brook Ill., oversaw development and testing of an online course and support materials to improve communica...
The rapid rise of antibiotic resistance can be tracked using ResistanceMap, an online tool that visually highlights regions of the country w...
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
This poll shows most Americans believe the quality of U.S. health care is average at best. More than half of American adults surveyed barely...
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.
Health care reform may create incentives to spur the growth in HDHPs and CDHPs, a move that might help hold costs down?at least for a time.
The authors suggest repairing the health care system by realigning provider incentives, increasing the availability of information with whic...
While the ACA is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provi...