Until health care delivery is treated like a science with goals, measures of quality, and systems to collect data and monitor improvements, the U.S. will not be able to effectively improve patient care and safety, according to this essay by two Johns Hopkins University health care policy experts, appearing in the special issue Health Services Research in 2020.
While the United States has had tremendous success in biomedical research, it has demonstrated poor performance in bringing treatments effectively and efficiently to patients. According to the authors, this is due to a lack of investment in understanding and improving the science of health care delivery.
- Treating health care delivery as a science requires developing relevant measures of patient care quality. This necessitates confronting thorny issues, such as discerning between preventable versus inevitable harm.
- Meaningful quality “scorecards” and goals must be useful to both consumers buying health care and clinicians trying to improve care, and also must be relevant from the hospital unit level to the national level.
- Reliable, consistent tracking of quality measures depends upon a robust data infrastructure, which will require investment in health information technology and trained personnel.
- The authors recommend creation of a regulatory structure in health care quality, similar to that of the SEC or FASB in financial regulation, to develop standards for, oversee and require the collection of data for public disclosure.
- They believe, however, there is a need for innovation in meaningful reporting of data to the public and clinicians, and contend the private sector would compete to do this.
- The authors call for development of a “health care quality profession” with formal and credible roles within organizations.
According to the authors, it is time to rapidly mature the science of health care delivery in order to raise quality and lower costs of health care in the U.S.
- 1 Data Governance and Stewardship
- 2 Balancing Access to Health Data and Privacy
- 3 Health Services Research and Data Linkages
- 4 Data and Measurement Issues in the Analysis of Health Disparities
- 5 Viewing Health Care Delivery as Science
- 6 Multiple Chronic Conditions and Disabilities
- 7 Modeling Health Care Policy Alternatives
- 8 Improving Evaluations of Value-Based Purchasing Programs
- 9 Data and Methods to Facilitate Delivery System Reform
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Learn how The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is dedicated to building a culture of health in Risa Lavizzo-Mourey's 2014 annual message.
A new paper reports on the proceedings of an unprecedented meeting that brought together diverse leaders from community colleges around the ...
How the tragic loss of a dancer's leg led to a Culture of Health within the team that restored her mobility.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps can be put to use right away to help create a culture of health in your community.
Noteworthy quotes about nurses and nursing, from the April 2014 issue of Sharing Nursing’s Knowledge, RWJF's nursing e-letter.
The reconvened Commission to Build a Healthier America will provide new guidance in three key areas: early childhood, healthy communities, a...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
In the April 2014 Sharing Nursing's Knowledge, British nurse Nathan Filer wins a prestigious literary prize for his debut novel about mourni...
The RWJF DataHub tracks state-level data, and allows visitors to customize and visualize facts and figures.