As the population ages and health care improves, more Americans are living with multiple chronic conditions and disabilities. This has significant implications for providing, tracking and evaluating the quality of patient care, according to this essay in Health Services Research in 2020.
Current health care reform is based on efforts to improve data and move toward evidence-based performance measures and performance-based payments. This could have important consequences for people with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) or disabilities. The author argues these people must be specifically considered when performing comparative effectiveness research; and suggests data that should be included.
- Performance measures and comparative effectiveness research generally are single organ or disease-based and either ignore the consequences of MCCs and disabilities or exclude these patients from the data, leaving large gaps in knowledge about how to treat this medically-complex population. This may subject patients to additional risk.
- The current national commitment to improve the health care data landscape will likely also improve the ability to monitor the quality of health care delivery to people with disabilities and MCCs.
- Collecting better data about this population, however, will require the current disease-based coding system to expand to recognize functional impairments, including the inability to participate in facets of daily and community life. Such systems exist but the cost and process of transition will be significant.
- A new coding system must also incorporate a way to code narrative text in the health records of this population.
The author includes a list of eight specific research recommendations for health services research concerning people with MCCs and disabilities. The author notes that, while improving the efficiency and quality of health care are obvious goals, attention must be paid to improving the quality of life and health outcomes for these individuals.
- 1. Data Governance and Stewardship
- 2. Balancing Access to Health Data and Privacy
- 3. Health Services Research and Data Linkages
- 4. Data and Measurement Issues in the Analysis of Health Disparities
- 5. Viewing Health Care Delivery as Science
- 6. Multiple Chronic Conditions and Disabilities
- 7. Modeling Health Care Policy Alternatives
- 8. Improving Evaluations of Value-Based Purchasing Programs
- 9. Data and Methods to Facilitate Delivery System Reform
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Progress and lessons learned from two programs that seek to advance the impact digital games can have on health.
Joint Commission Resources in Oak Brook Ill., oversaw development and testing of an online course and support materials to improve communica...
The rapid rise of antibiotic resistance can be tracked using ResistanceMap, an online tool that visually highlights regions of the country w...
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
This poll shows most Americans believe the quality of U.S. health care is average at best. More than half of American adults surveyed barely...
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.
Health care reform may create incentives to spur the growth in HDHPs and CDHPs, a move that might help hold costs down?at least for a time.
The authors suggest repairing the health care system by realigning provider incentives, increasing the availability of information with whic...
While the ACA is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provi...