A successful method for identifying health inequities must assess health care, housing, transportation, education and other community characteristics.
Health policy now distinguishes between health disparities and inequities: disparities are statistical differences in rates of illness, disease and other conditions; health inequities refer to social, economic and environmental factors that affect health.
The goal of Healthy People 2020, a national initiative, is the correction of health inequities. However, ineffective data collection has prevented researchers from identifying both health disparities and inequities.
This article explores methods for researching health disparities and inequities. The authors describe research methods that might overcome small-sampling size, a difficulty in past research. Promising data collections include: oversampling, pooled data, targeted periodic surveys, multiple frame sample designs, modeling approaches, mixed mode surveys, regulations and incentives for providers, and granular data collection.
- In order to overcome the limitations of small-sample size, studies have combined data from several years and conducted targeted studies within racial and ethnic communities.
- A nationwide health information infrastructure that makes use of electronic health records could facilitate research into health disparities.
- Indirect estimation techniques have been a useful tool for assessing health disparities.
In 1985, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reported high mortality rates among African-Americans. Since then, health disparities have become a focus of public policy. The goal of Healthy People 2020, a recent national initiative, is to correct inequities—a complex measure of social, economic and environmental health factors. This article explores strategies for improving research of health disparities and inequities.
- 1 Data Governance and Stewardship
- 2 Balancing Access to Health Data and Privacy
- 3 Health Services Research and Data Linkages
- 4 Data and Measurement Issues in the Analysis of Health Disparities
- 5 Viewing Health Care Delivery as Science
- 6 Multiple Chronic Conditions and Disabilities
- 7 Modeling Health Care Policy Alternatives
- 8 Improving Evaluations of Value-Based Purchasing Programs
- 9 Data and Methods to Facilitate Delivery System Reform
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
CDC: Measles Remains a Threat to U.S. Health Security - HHS: $55.5M to Strengthen Training of U.S. Health Professionals, Especially in Nursi...
A conference in St. Paul, Minnesota earlier this month examined ideas and emerging examples for building a healthier Minnesota by promoting ...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
Janet Tomiyama was recently named the 2013 recipient of the Early Career Investigator Award from the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.