In this paper, Harold D. Miller of the RWJF-commissioned Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform takes an in-depth look at practical ways to successfully manage the multifaceted implementation challenges inherent with payment reform initiatives, using lessons learned from previous efforts.
From the Report
There is widespread agreement that current methods of paying for health care contribute to both high costs and poor quality. Not only do they create strong incentives to increase the volume of services delivered, current payment methods often create barriers to delivering higher quality and more efficient care and can even penalize health care providers for keeping people healthy, reducing errors and complications, and avoiding unnecessary services.
To date the only broadly implemented changes in payment systems to try and address these issues have been pay-for-performance (P4P) programs. Although P4P programs have encouraged some improvements in quality, most involve relatively small amounts of funding and focus on relatively few care processes. Most importantly, they do not correct the problems in the underlying payment systems, falling short of the reform needed to deliver true change.
Two fundamental types of reforms in payment systems are needed:
Episode-of-Care Payment, i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services which are provided to a patient during a single episode of care (e.g., the treatment of a heart attack), rather than making separate payments to hospitals, physicians, and other providers and rather than paying more for services needed to address preventable complications. Episode of Care Payment gives the involved providers an incentive to coordinate their activities, eliminate unnecessary services, and avoid preventable complications.
Comprehensive Care Payment (often called “global payment”), i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services needed to manage a patient’s conditions during a fixed period of time, regardless of how many separate episodes of care occur. This gives the providers involved in the patient’s care the flexibility to try innovative approaches and tailor services based on the patient’s needs, and it gives
them an incentive to avoid hospitalizations and unnecessary or overly-expensive services.
Although there is now growing recognition that these kinds of payment reforms are necessary if significant improvements in health care quality and costs are to be achieved, the challenge has become convincing health care providers, payers, purchasers, and consumers that they are feasible and helping them overcome the significant hurdles to implementation. The changes are inherently complex and risky, and the payers, providers, and communities that are interested in pursuing them face many practical challenges in doing so.
- 1 Aligning Forces for Quality: At the Forefront of Reform
- 2 Aligning Forces for Quality Report
- 3 How Registries Can Help Performance Measurement Improve Care
- 4 The ABCs of Measurement
- 5 Provisions Related to Quality in the New Health Reform Law
- 6 The State of Health Care Quality 2009
- 7 An Overview of Final Regulations Implementing HITECH's Meaningful Use Provisions and Their Implications for Regional Collaboratives
- 8 Making Reform a Reality
- 9 Quality & Equality in U.S. Health Care
- 10 How to Display Comparative Information that People Can Understand and Use
- 11 How to Describe the Health and Community Context for Comparative Performance Reports
- 12 Sample Site for Reporting Health Care Quality Data
- 13 Consumer Decision Points in Accessing Comparative Health Care Information
- 14 Improving Care Coordination by Streamlining Patient Referrals
- 15 Modifying the Admission Process to Improve the Collection and Accuracy of REL Data Collection
- 16 Modifying the Registration System to Accurately and Efficiently Capture Patient Language Preference
- 17 Ensuring REL Data Collection with the Use of a Post-Discharge Survey Tool
- 18 Ensuring Interpreter Qualifications and Standards Through Vendor Contracts
- 19 Educating and Motivating the Community to Reduce Disparities
RWJF Scholar examines neighborhood-based death rates from opiate-based painkiller overdoses, compared with heroin overdose deaths.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Learn how The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is dedicated to building a culture of health in Risa Lavizzo-Mourey's 2014 annual message.
RWJF Health & Society Scholar Brendan Saloner on subsidized health insurance's impact on family economics.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps can be put to use right away to help create a culture of health in your community.
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
A short distance can mean large disparities in health. Across America, babies born just a few miles apart have dramatic differences in life ...
CDC: Mixed Progress in Food Safety Efforts - FDA: Common Procedure to Remove Uterus, Uterine Fibroids Can Spread Cancer - Approximately 12M ...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
This is a list of the Foundation's audited financial statements and form 990-PF.
The RWJF DataHub tracks state-level data, and allows visitors to customize and visualize facts and figures.