In 2005–07, researchers at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health developed a tool to measure the work environment of ambulatory care clinics. The tool identifies workplace factors that can affect the quality of care patients receive.
To develop the tool, the researchers relied on survey and medical record data from a larger project funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome—or MEMO—study. The MEMO study determined the effect of the ambulatory care work environment on quality of care and the role of physicians as mediators of this effect. (Work on the tool began under the MEMO study.)
Researchers analyzed data from 422 family physicians and general internists and 96 clinic managers at clinics in New York City, Chicago and three locations in Wisconsin. The study also examined data on 1,796 patients with one or more of three medical conditions:
- Type 2 diabetes
- Congestive heart failure
During the project, the researchers:
- Identified clinics with low rates of medical errors and other indicators of high-quality care, based on indices derived from medical record data on patient care and outcomes.
- Identified key characteristics of clinics that scored highly on at least two of the five indicators and above average on the others
- Conducted focus groups with medical providers and staff at four high-scoring clinics to discuss how data assembled for the project reflects clinic practices and how it should be presented
- Developed and refined a tool for measuring the ambulatory care workplace, based on focus group input
- The main project result was the final development and refinement of the OWL, the Office & Work Life measure. "The OWL provides a roadmap for areas where quality is present and worklife is healthy, and to areas where both could be improved," according to the project team.
Project Director Mark Linzer, MD, described the OWL as "a snapshot of a clinic, showing what the physicians are experiencing, what the staff is experiencing and what the patients in the waiting room are experiencing."
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Progress and lessons learned from two programs that seek to advance the impact digital games can have on health.
Joint Commission Resources in Oak Brook Ill., oversaw development and testing of an online course and support materials to improve communica...
The rapid rise of antibiotic resistance can be tracked using ResistanceMap, an online tool that visually highlights regions of the country w...
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
This poll shows most Americans believe the quality of U.S. health care is average at best. More than half of American adults surveyed barely...
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.
Health care reform may create incentives to spur the growth in HDHPs and CDHPs, a move that might help hold costs down?at least for a time.
The authors suggest repairing the health care system by realigning provider incentives, increasing the availability of information with whic...
While the ACA is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provi...