Unwelcome as the news might sometimes be, there is as much to learn from foundation programs that fail to meet expectations as there is from programs that have met or exceeded them—perhaps more. The truth is that not every program can succeed as planned. Thus, it is not surprising that some Foundation-funded programs that seemed like good ideas at the time have not turned out to be so in practice.The important thing is to learn from those programs that have not met expectations. A first step is trying to understand why programs did not work out as planned. Our review of Foundation-funded programs that did not meet expectations identified three primary reasons that they did not succeed.
The first is flawed strategy or design. Goals may be unrealistic or unreachable. Objectives may be unclear, or even conflicting. Various participants may have different ideas about what the goals are. Or the goal may be sound but the strategies to reach them problematic or unworkable.The second is a difficult environmental context. Though the goals may be worthy, society is simply not ready for them or they may not be politically feasible. Or conditions at the planning stage are overtaken by economic, political or social events, rendering even a well-conceived program ineffective in practice.The third is faulty execution. There are myriad reasons that programs are not implemented effectively—lack of management ability, poor interpersonal relations skills, flawed leadership, bad judgment, and intra-organizational controversy, to name just a few.
As important as understanding why programs have not lived up to expectations is drawing lessons from them. This involves learning how to identify problems early and, where possible, addressing them in a timely manner, as well as using the lessons from disappointing efforts in the design of new programs. In the first chapter of the Anthology, authors Colby and Isaacs provide some examples of Foundation-funded programs that did not meet expectations and lessons learned.
- 1. Foreword
- 2. Editors' Introduction
- 3. Acknowledgments
- 4. Good Ideas at the Time
- 5. New Direction, Midcourse
- 6. The National Health Care Purchasing Institute
- 7. The Role of Failure in Philanthropic Learning
- 8. Communications at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- 9. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Efforts to Combat Drug Addiction
- 10. Reclaiming Futures
- 11. The College Alcohol Study
- 12. Overcoming Language Barriers to Care: Hablamos Juntos
- 13. MicheLee Puppets and the Fight Against Child Obesity
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Progress and lessons learned from two programs that seek to advance the impact digital games can have on health.
Joint Commission Resources in Oak Brook Ill., oversaw development and testing of an online course and support materials to improve communica...
The rapid rise of antibiotic resistance can be tracked using ResistanceMap, an online tool that visually highlights regions of the country w...
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
This poll shows most Americans believe the quality of U.S. health care is average at best. More than half of American adults surveyed barely...
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.
Health care reform may create incentives to spur the growth in HDHPs and CDHPs, a move that might help hold costs down?at least for a time.
The authors suggest repairing the health care system by realigning provider incentives, increasing the availability of information with whic...
While the ACA is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provi...