A key issue in the health reform debate is how best to provide affordable, high-quality health insurance for an estimated 36 million uninsured U.S.citizens.
One analysis suggests that 6 million Americans would ultimately meet eligibility requirements and would choose to enroll in a public plan.
In general, supporters believe that a public plan could bring new competition, choice, and accountability to the provision of health insurance. Administrative expenses could be lower than for private insurers, and there would be no need to generate returns for shareholders; as a result, dollars spent on health coverage would stretch further.
The version of the public plan passed by the U.S. House of Representatives would negotiate payment rates with doctors, hospitals, and other providers, and supporters hope those rates could be lower than those paid by private insurers. The public plan would also be required to develop innovative payment mechanisms that could ultimately hold down the rate of increase
in health costs.
Opponents of a public plan argue that it would present unfair competition to private health insurers. Some provider organizations worry that by driving down prices, a public plan would reduce their ability to provide high-quality care. Employer and insurer organizations add that in order to maintain their revenues, health care providers might “cost-shift” by raising charges to employer-based plans.
Finally, there are also growing questions, on the part of both supporters and opponents alike, about how viable or effective the latest redesigned version of the public plan is likely to be.
This Health Policy Brief lays out details of the public health insurance plan and explores the key arguments for and against it, and was published online on November 10, 2009 in Health Affairs.
Health Affairs/RWJF Health Policy Briefs
Series provides clear, accessible overviews of timely and important health policy topics. The briefs are geared to policy-makers, congressional staffers, and others who need short, jargon-free explanations of health policy basics.About the series
- About this grant
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
CDC: Measles Remains a Threat to U.S. Health Security - HHS: $55.5M to Strengthen Training of U.S. Health Professionals, Especially in Nursi...
A conference in St. Paul, Minnesota earlier this month examined ideas and emerging examples for building a healthier Minnesota by promoting ...
Janet Tomiyama was recently named the 2013 recipient of the Early Career Investigator Award from the Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
RWJF announced winners to the AF4Q Games to Generate Data Challenge and the Hospital Price Transparency challenge at Health 2.0's fall confe...