A key issue in the health reform debate is how best to provide affordable, high-quality health insurance for an estimated 36 million uninsured U.S.citizens.
One analysis suggests that 6 million Americans would ultimately meet eligibility requirements and would choose to enroll in a public plan.
In general, supporters believe that a public plan could bring new competition, choice, and accountability to the provision of health insurance. Administrative expenses could be lower than for private insurers, and there would be no need to generate returns for shareholders; as a result, dollars spent on health coverage would stretch further.
The version of the public plan passed by the U.S. House of Representatives would negotiate payment rates with doctors, hospitals, and other providers, and supporters hope those rates could be lower than those paid by private insurers. The public plan would also be required to develop innovative payment mechanisms that could ultimately hold down the rate of increase
in health costs.
Opponents of a public plan argue that it would present unfair competition to private health insurers. Some provider organizations worry that by driving down prices, a public plan would reduce their ability to provide high-quality care. Employer and insurer organizations add that in order to maintain their revenues, health care providers might “cost-shift” by raising charges to employer-based plans.
Finally, there are also growing questions, on the part of both supporters and opponents alike, about how viable or effective the latest redesigned version of the public plan is likely to be.
This Health Policy Brief lays out details of the public health insurance plan and explores the key arguments for and against it, and was published online on November 10, 2009 in Health Affairs.
Health Affairs/RWJF Health Policy Briefs
Series provides clear, accessible overviews of timely and important health policy topics. The briefs are geared to policy-makers, congressional staffers, and others who need short, jargon-free explanations of health policy basics.About the series
- About this grant
RWJF Scholar examines neighborhood-based death rates from opiate-based painkiller overdoses, compared with heroin overdose deaths.
This month the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health published a special issue of its magazine devoted to food.
Unengaged patients can incur costs of up to 21% higher than patients who are highly engaged in care. This suite of materials from RWJF's AF4...
The LEAP project identified 30 primary care practices that use health professionals and other staff in ways that maximize access to their se...
Learn how The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is dedicated to building a culture of health in Risa Lavizzo-Mourey's 2014 annual message.
Adverse working conditions contribute substantially to the risk of depression for working-age adults, according to new research from a team ...
List of most current annual reports.
A national conversation highlighting efforts to improve care transitions, reduce avoidable hospital readmissions, and lift overall quality o...
The Health and Medical Care Archives at the University of Michigan's Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research is the of...
The reconvened Commission to Build a Healthier America will provide new guidance in three key areas: early childhood, healthy communities, a...
The RWJF DataHub tracks state-level data, and allows visitors to customize and visualize facts and figures.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.