From 2006 to 2009, the National Academy of Social Insurance and the National Academy of Public Administration convened an expert study panel to examine the likely administrative issues involved in reforming the health care system, and published reports on their findings and recommendations.
Key Results: Project staff reported the following results in published documents and a report to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF):
- The expert study panel identified and described seven core administrative activities and functions that need to be performed regardless of the health system in place:
- Planning and coordinating implementation.
- Subsidizing health insurance premiums and cost sharing.
- Administering health insurance mandates.
- Regulating health insurance.
- Restructuring health insurance markets.
- Designing administrative organizations.
- Simplifying administration and controlling costs.
- Experts commissioned by the study panel wrote 10 research papers examining issues related to the seven core administrative activities and functions. Shorter versions of these papers were published in a book.
- The National Academy of Social Insurance and the National Academy of Public Administration published Administrative Solutions in Health Reform: Report of the Study Panel on Administrative Issues in Expanding Access to Health Care, a summary of the project's findings (July 2009).
- Project staff widely disseminated study findings to congressional and executive branch staff.
Key Findings and Recommendations: Project staff reported the following key findings and recommendations in Administrative Solutions in Health Reform: Report of the Study Panel on Administrative Issues in Expanding Access to Health Care (July 2009):
- To the extent feasible, health reform should build on existing governmental capacities, arrangements and institutions.
- The president should promptly designate an agency and a person to direct the implementation of health reform.
- Administrative issues and their connections with each other should receive careful attention as legislation is developed and implemented.
- The agency with primary responsibility for implementing health reform should have political stature and operational flexibility.
- Health reform legislation should include a carefully constructed schedule for phasing in its many varied elements.
- The administrative challenges posed by expanding health care can be met.
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Progress and lessons learned from two programs that seek to advance the impact digital games can have on health.
Joint Commission Resources in Oak Brook Ill., oversaw development and testing of an online course and support materials to improve communica...
The rapid rise of antibiotic resistance can be tracked using ResistanceMap, an online tool that visually highlights regions of the country w...
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
This poll shows most Americans believe the quality of U.S. health care is average at best. More than half of American adults surveyed barely...
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.
Health care reform may create incentives to spur the growth in HDHPs and CDHPs, a move that might help hold costs down?at least for a time.
The authors suggest repairing the health care system by realigning provider incentives, increasing the availability of information with whic...
While the ACA is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provi...