From 2006 to 2009, the National Academy of Social Insurance and the National Academy of Public Administration convened an expert study panel to examine the likely administrative issues involved in reforming the health care system, and published reports on their findings and recommendations.
Key Results: Project staff reported the following results in published documents and a report to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF):
- The expert study panel identified and described seven core administrative activities and functions that need to be performed regardless of the health system in place:
- Planning and coordinating implementation.
- Subsidizing health insurance premiums and cost sharing.
- Administering health insurance mandates.
- Regulating health insurance.
- Restructuring health insurance markets.
- Designing administrative organizations.
- Simplifying administration and controlling costs.
- Experts commissioned by the study panel wrote 10 research papers examining issues related to the seven core administrative activities and functions. Shorter versions of these papers were published in a book.
- The National Academy of Social Insurance and the National Academy of Public Administration published Administrative Solutions in Health Reform: Report of the Study Panel on Administrative Issues in Expanding Access to Health Care, a summary of the project's findings (July 2009).
- Project staff widely disseminated study findings to congressional and executive branch staff.
Key Findings and Recommendations: Project staff reported the following key findings and recommendations in Administrative Solutions in Health Reform: Report of the Study Panel on Administrative Issues in Expanding Access to Health Care (July 2009):
- To the extent feasible, health reform should build on existing governmental capacities, arrangements and institutions.
- The president should promptly designate an agency and a person to direct the implementation of health reform.
- Administrative issues and their connections with each other should receive careful attention as legislation is developed and implemented.
- The agency with primary responsibility for implementing health reform should have political stature and operational flexibility.
- Health reform legislation should include a carefully constructed schedule for phasing in its many varied elements.
- The administrative challenges posed by expanding health care can be met.
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
By Roy L. Simpson, RN, C, FAAN, DPNAP, Vice President, Nursing, Cerner Corporation Technology erases the traditional boundaries of space and...
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
Around the country, print, broadcast, and online media outlets are covering the groundbreaking work of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)...
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.