Starting in February 1995, investigators at the University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, conducted the Physician Compensation Research Project.
The project examined how the different methods used by managed care organizations (MCOs) to compensate primary care physicians affected the utilization and cost of health care services, as well as physician productivity.
This project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) national program Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO).
- Contrary to their expectations, the investigators found that the method of compensation for physicians—whether fee-for-service or salary—had a negligible impact on their treatment decisions for individual patients.
- Instead, the principal drivers of the use and cost of health care services were enrollee and physician characteristics.
- The use and cost of services were higher for female enrollees, older enrollees and enrollees with more benefits.
- Use and cost of services were lower for enrollees who were cared for by older physicians or by physicians working under a utilization management program.
- It must be noted that Washington State has a history of encouraging clinical efficiency even without financial incentives. Thus, it is not clear if the results of this study are generalizable since compensation mechanisms may be more likely to affect behavior in other locations.
Phases II and III
- Their research showed that physician compensation methods that are tied to productivity do increase individual productivity.
- In addition, they found that not-for-profit groups, multi-specialty groups, female physicians and physicians with fewer years of experience are less productive.
- The investigators note that the medical groups studied may not be representative of all medical groups in the United States.
Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, Changes in Health Care Financing and OrganizationRead the Program Results for Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization
- About this grant
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
MTV executives are attempting to mollify nurses and nursing allies who are outraged over a salacious new “reality” television show about a g...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.