From 1998 to 2003, staff at the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, Alexandria, Va., conducted a national hospice outcomes project to assess the impact of various treatment strategies on the quality of hospice care.
The nonprofit National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization represents U.S. hospice and palliative care programs and professionals.
Project staff conducted a study with 13 hospices to collect data on pain control, dyspnea and self-determined life closure for 1,306 hospice patients.
The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF) national program Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative.
Key Findings: Project staff reported the following preliminary findings (as of April 2004):
- On admission to the hospice, 91 percent of patients had scores of 50 percent or less on the Palliative Performance Scale, which measures progressive decline in palliative-care patients from fully ambulatory (100%) to death (0%).
- Of 3,958 pairs of pain assessments, the outcome for pain was clearly bad in 721 episodes (18.2%) and had the best outcome in 1,236 episodes (31.2%). The remaining 2,001 pairs had varying levels of good outcomes.
- Pain is best studied at the episode level, rather than at the patient level. The researchers noted that, in regular life, patients have good and bad spells, and it is necessary to study pain at the episode level to determine what works best.
Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative Projects - Strategy 1
Individual project results from the RWJF Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative, strategy 1: To improve the knowledge and capacity of health care professionals and others to care for the dying.Read the Program Results for Targeted End-of-Life Projects Initiative
- About this grant
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
MTV executives are attempting to mollify nurses and nursing allies who are outraged over a salacious new “reality” television show about a g...
Helping us understand what’s driving high health care costs is why we need more transparency in the prices, costs and quality of health care...
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Behavioral economists compete in an Innovation Tournament, devising “nudges” to help make people healthier.