In this 2000–2001 project, Linda Bergthold, PhD, and researchers at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., surveyed health plan medical directors in 48 states about medical necessity decision making. The study provides input for policy-making at the state and national levels.
The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO) national program.
As the project came to a close, researchers tested the findings among attendees of a research dissemination conference funded by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. They asked the attendees to consider the findings, discuss their day-to-day implications and outline potential policy initiatives.
Key Findings: Researchers reported the following findings:
- Medical directors and state regulators hold significantly different views on the definitions of "medical necessity" and "coverage" and on how they should be applied.
- Variation between medical directors and regulators, and among regulators, contributes to a lack of a cohesive "coverage-decision" framework for consumers, health plans and regulators and to a state-by-state patchwork of regulations.
- Over 50 percent of medical directors prefer to consult technology assessment reports from both private and public organizations (such as the BlueCross BlueShield Technology Evaluation Center; Hayes; and Medicare) to evaluate new clinical interventions.
- Regulators tend to make decisions based upon a pre-determined set of rules, rather than on clinical factors. As a result variability in consumer protection from state to state is likely and health plans' policies may not be based upon the best available clinical and cost-effectiveness data.
- Participants in the research dissemination conference agreed that clarity and consistency are needed in defining medical necessity and making coverage decisions.
Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, Changes in Health Care Financing and OrganizationRead the Program Results for Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization
- About this grant
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
NewPublicHealth spoke with John Auerbach, professor at Northeastern University and the primary author of a report on the Trust, and Cheryl B...
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Imagine a shared national culture of health in which being healthy and staying healthy are esteemed social values.
Read highlights from college students’ recent trip to the front lines of health care in urban New Jersey.
NewPublicHealth spoke with the Julio Frenk, MD, MPH, PHD, Dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, about how public health has changed o...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.