From 1998 to 2000, a partnership between the American College of Mental Health Administration and five major U.S. accrediting organizations produced a consensus set of indicators for behavioral health services.
Indicators are particular aspects of health care that can be quantified and measured to assess whether a process or outcome occurs.
The college, founded in 1979, is an interdisciplinary leadership group composed of a range of stakeholders in behavioral health, including public and private providers, purchasers, consumers, advocates, individual practitioners, researchers/academics and managed care companies.
Historically, the behavioral health field has had no "gold standard" for measuring performance and outcomes. In 1997, the American College of Mental Health Administration initiated a national dialog on achieving consensus in quality measurement with a series of annual meetings known as the Santa Fe Summits.
The American College of Mental Health Administration and five national accrediting organizations — jointly known as the Accreditation Organization Workgroup — began a process of reaching agreement on what is important to measure and how to measure it. The five accrediting organizations included:
- National Committee for Quality Assurance.
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
- Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission.
- Council on the Accreditation of Services for Families and Children.
- Council on Quality and Leadership in Support of Persons with Disabilities.
Along with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), a number of other organizations supported the efforts of the Accreditation Organization Workgroup, including the MacArthur Foundation, Eli Lilly, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and the Health Care Financing Administration (now known as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).
- The Accreditation Organization Workgroup met six times, resulting in the development and dissemination of a proposed consensus set of indicators.
- An important byproduct of this project has been the development of a new level of collaboration among the accrediting organizations.
The workgroup has disseminated more than 700 copies of their 2001 Interim Report: A Proposed Consensus Set of Indicators for Behavioral Health to American College of Mental Health Administration members, conference attendees and accrediting organizations. The report also is available online.
After the Grant
While agreement on what is important to measure has been reached, the problems of data collection, measurement, implementation and reporting — or, how to measure it — have yet to be addressed. In addition, more work is needed to apply these general behavioral health indicators to children's and substance abuse services. The workgroup believes that this next step will require a national dialogue within the field.
Concurrent with the release of the workgroup's report, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration organized a Carter Center Forum to develop "common" indicators for behavioral health. The forum adopted the workgroup's proposed indicators with some modifications and will continue the dialog at a meeting in 2003.
RWJF supported this project through a grant of $45,000.
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
NewPublicHealth spoke with John Auerbach, professor at Northeastern University and the primary author of a report on the Trust, and Cheryl B...
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
Imagine a shared national culture of health in which being healthy and staying healthy are esteemed social values.
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Enabling patients to see their doctors' visit notes is a simple idea that can transform the way patients engage with their health.
America is not getting good value for its health care dollar. These resources explore issues of cost and value of health care.