In 1996, the University of Chicago Center for Health Administration Studies developed and published two papers: one on barriers to primary care training in internal medicine and the other on a comparison of major databases on graduate medical education.
The project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) national program Generalist Provider Research Initiative.
Key Findings: In the first paper, The Production of Generalist Physicians for Practice in Internal Medicine: Results from the National Study of Internal Medicine Manpower, the investigator reported:
- The objective of reaching a 50-50 mix of generalists and specialists in graduate medical education training was widely accepted by directors of training programs in internal medicine in 1993.
- The rates of subspecialty placements declined, respectively, by about 4 percent and 3 percent in 1994–95 and 1995–96.
- The principal barriers to a more rapid shift to primary care were a combination of institutional constraints and limited program resources.
In the second paper, A Comparison of Graduate Medical Education Databases: Internal Medicine, the investigator reported:
- There is agreement on the total number of internal medicine residents.
- There is variation in the reported numbers of first-year internal medicine residents.
- The reported number of subspecialty fellows varies from 11 percent to 28 percent for the years 1987–93.
- The universes included in each database are different.
- The completeness of data collection varies.
Generalist Provider Research Initiative Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, Generalist Provider Research InitiativeRead the Program Results for Generalist Provider Research Initiative
- About this grant
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
Imagine a shared national culture of health in which being healthy and staying healthy are esteemed social values.
NewPublicHealth spoke with John Auerbach, professor at Northeastern University and the primary author of a report on the Trust, and Cheryl B...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
2013 America’s Health Rankings Finds Significant Progress in National Health - FDA to Phase Out Use of Certain Antimicrobials in Food Animal...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
NewPublicHealth spoke with Danny McGoldrick, vice president of research at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, about “A Broken Promise to Ou...
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.
Risa Lavizzo-Mourey reflects on the Foundation’s bold new vision in which we, as a nation, will strive together to create a culture of healt...