From 1992 to 1995, researchers at the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., assessed the overall effects of preferred provider organizations (PPOs) on hospital, outpatient, physician, and total health care costs and utilization. They compared costs of care in the PPOs with those of managed indemnity plans.
This project was part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) national program Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO).
Key Findings: PPO plans allow enrollees to use the services of any physician of their choosing and pay a set percentage of the price of services that are covered under the benefit package.
PPOs rely solely on utilization controls—limiting coverage of services in the benefits package to control costs and setting limits on the usual and customary fee on which the plan pays a percentage.
The researchers found that:
- On average, PPOs showed costs savings of approximately 12 to 14 percent above indemnity plans with utilization controls.
- Smaller PPOs were more likely to have insignificant cost savings than larger PPOs.
- The majority of cost savings were the result of lower rates of use rather than lower prices per procedure.
- PPOs deny fewer services than indemnity plans and have lower levels of cost sharing.
- Savings associated with denial of benefits because the service/procedure is not included in the benefits package are more common in indemnity plans than in PPOs.
Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization Project Results
Individual project results from the RWJF national program, Changes in Health Care Financing and OrganizationRead the Program Results for Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization
- About this grant
Executive Nurse Fellow Jerry Mansfield explains why the University Hospital and the Richard M. Ross Heart Hospital do not have a BSN-only hi...
The What's Next Health series features leading thinkers and visionaries. Stanford social scientist & innovator BJ Fogg discusses his model f...
We create new opportunities for better health by investing in health where it starts—in our homes, schools, and jobs.
NewPublicHealth spoke with John Auerbach, professor at Northeastern University and the primary author of a report on the Trust, and Cheryl B...
When companies invest in employee wellness, it’s good for health, productivity ... and the bottom line.
Imagine a shared national culture of health in which being healthy and staying healthy are esteemed social values.
Patrick M. Krueger recently co-authored a study that examines the characteristics and mortality risks of nondrinker subgroups to explain why...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
Read highlights from college students’ recent trip to the front lines of health care in urban New Jersey.
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.
Enabling patients to see their doctors' visit notes is a simple idea that can transform the way patients engage with their health.