The findings and lessons from a large, multiyear research-and-demonstration project that investigated the care provided to critically ill hospitalized patients at the end of life are presented in this chapter of the Anthology. SUPPORT, as the study was called, was motivated by a sense that services provided to people who are dying overemphasize heroic, high-tech innovations at the expense of caring and comforting. Although the motivation was simple, it turns out that the problem is not. This chapter describes the complexity of addressing the issue of what services ought to be delivered at the end of life and the difficulty of changing norms and practices in the world of medicine. The author emphasizes that it is not so simple even to identify what we mean by "the end of life."
Considerable effort was given to ensuring that the project's findings would receive widespread media attention. As a result, the project seems to be provoking the wide-ranging and, we hope, sustained debate that is necessary to make progress on this problem. The study was reported in cover stories of weekly news magazines and many articles in noted academic journals. The researchers have been barraged with requests to appear on television and radio shows to discuss the implications of the findings.
The findings from the demonstration project at the core of the study were negative: the interventions did not achieve the goals expected. However, the large investment by the Foundation—which has totaled approximately $29 million to date—may have other payoffs. The findings clarified that changes in care at the end of life are not going to happen with marginal adjustments in the way we organize services. It takes a much more sustained effort on many fronts to refocus priorities for the care of the critically ill. Changes in social norms, professional values and social priorities all need to be part of the solution.
- 1 Foreword
- 2 Editors' Introduction
- 3 Acknowledgements: 1997
- 4 Reach Out
- 5 A Review of the National Access-to-Care Surveys
- 6 Improving the Health Care Workforce
- 7 Expertise Meets Politics
- 8 The Media and Change in Health Systems
- 9 Addressing the Problem of Medical Malpractice
- 10 Unmet Need in the Community
- 11 Unexpected Returns
- 12 Developing Child Immunizations Registries
- 13 The Homeless Families Program
- 14 The National Health and Social Life Survey
RWJF Scholar examines neighborhood-based death rates from opiate-based painkiller overdoses, compared with heroin overdose deaths.
Learn how The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is dedicated to building a culture of health in Risa Lavizzo-Mourey's 2014 annual message.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps can be put to use right away to help create a culture of health in your community.
RWJF Nurse Faculty Scholar Jennifer Bellot writes about losing her grandmother to complications from a medical error.
RWJF Health & Society Scholar Brendan Saloner on subsidized health insurance's impact on family economics.
A new paper reports on the proceedings of an unprecedented meeting that brought together diverse leaders from community colleges around the ...
Developing small community homes as alternatives to nursing homes, this radical, new national model for skilled nursing care returns control...
CDC: Mixed Progress in Food Safety Efforts - FDA: Common Procedure to Remove Uterus, Uterine Fibroids Can Spread Cancer - Approximately 12M ...
The RWJF DataHub tracks state-level data, and allows visitors to customize and visualize facts and figures.
How can those of us who are passionate about building a Culture of Health close the gap between the time of invention and the time of mainst...
As part of National Public Health Week, PHLR—a grantee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation—has been participating in the week by contribut...
Team members, grantees, and guests discuss breakthrough ideas that will allow us to move toward solving challenges in health care.