Making Sense of the Debate Over Patient Access to Medical Information
Feb 16, 2012, 11:33 AM, Posted by Pioneer Blog Team
Lately, there’s been a lot of conversation about increasing patient access to medical information. Much of this debate was sparked when Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, stated, “When it comes to health care, information is power.” While many providers and most patients are in support of increasing patient access to medical information, there are some who feel this change will make doctors’ jobs harder.
OpenNotes, a Pioneer-supported program that makes it easy for patients to access their doctors’ notes after a visit, is at the heart of this debate, as was seen in a series of columns in February’s SGIM Forum. In this newsletter Tom Delbanco, MD, and Jan Walker, RN, MBA, the lead investigators working to determine the impact of sharing doctors’ notes with patients (Part 1), debate the merits of this new level of transparency with Douglas Olson, MD (Part 2), and well-known patient advocate e-Patient Dave (Part 3).
In a post on The Health Care Blog, John Lumpkin, MD, MPH, senior vice president and director of the Health Care Group at RWJF, weighs in on this debate. Learn why Lumpkin thinks that increasing access is a good idea and tell us what you think.
This commentary originally appeared on the RWJF Pioneering Ideas blog.