Apr 23, 2015, 9:00 AM, Posted by
Maryjoan Ladden, Susan Mende
As other countries continue to spend far less on health care but perform better on measurable health outcomes, there's opportunity to learn what works abroad and apply those lessons stateside.
It’s a hard notion for many Americans to accept—although we spend more money on health care than any other country in the world, we are far from having the best health outcomes. When you look at measures that include life expectancy, infant mortality rates and preventable illness, other countries that spend far less than the U.S. perform better. But in many of these countries people of all ages and socio-economic status are able to easily access primary care that is comprehensive, patient-centered and rooted in local communities.
One of our goals as program officers at RWJF is to look beyond our borders to identify promising practices that might be incorporated into America’s health care system. Last fall we traveled to Oxford, England, to learn first-hand about promising primary care practices in Chile, England, the Netherlands and Canada—all high and middle income countries that spend less on health care yet have better outcomes than the U.S. We attended a conference organized by the Training and Research Support Centre (TARSC), an organization supported by Charities Aid Foundation of America through a grant from the RWJF Donor-Advised Fund. TARSC provides support and training to government and civic health organizations, and the conference was the next step after its report, “Strengthening primary care in the USA to improve health: Learning from high and middle income countries.” We came away with a lot of insights from both, but were struck by several themes that were constant throughout.
View full post
Apr 16, 2015, 1:36 PM, Posted by
Anne Weiss, Susan Dentzer
“There is no single more powerful concept” in transforming health care than transparency—that is, accurate information for everybody about the costs, quality, and other aspects of health care—according to former US Senate Majority Leader and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Board Member Bill Frist at the Second National Summit on Transparency in Health Care Costs, Prices, and Quality. Not only is shining the spotlight on costs and quality the key to making health care markets work, Frist said, but it’s also central to delivering the vaunted Triple Aim of better health, better health care, and lower costs. Here are our key takeaways reflecting how much transparency discussions have advanced since the first RWJF sponsored summit in 2013:
View full post
Mar 31, 2015, 10:22 AM, Posted by
Recent advancements in payment reform have been massive and exciting. It's time to sustain the momentum and transform how we pay for and deliver care.
When it comes to how health care providers are paid, change is in the air. I’m probably more excited than most people about trying to make sure our financial incentives are flowing the right way within the health care system. Here’s why.
View full post
Feb 13, 2015, 5:06 PM, Posted by
Sometimes it feels like we take one step forward, two steps back when it comes to making sure that we are getting the best quality health care for the tremendous amount our society invests in it. Maybe sometimes it’s one step forward, three steps back.
But then I think about Aligning Forces for Quality—RWJF’s signature initiative to lift the quality and equality of care in 16 regions around the country—and my hope returns. While progress is slow, it is still progress.
More than 10 years ago, RWJF’s leadership suggested to me that we change course in our health care quality improvement strategy. Instead of testing single interventions in widely scattered sites, they asked, why not focus on a limited number of target communities where we could go deep with multiple approaches? We knew health care is essentially local, though shaped by state and federal policy.
View full post
Jan 27, 2015, 4:38 PM, Posted by
“If you’ve been waiting more than 15 minutes, please see the receptionist.”
That’s the sign that was posted on a bulletin board in the radiology clinic where I was waiting for an MRI earlier this month. The funny thing? It was so lost amid the other postings around it screaming for attention that I only saw it on my way out, as I waited for a copy of the disk with my MRI on it. It struck me as odd, and a little concerning; did that mean I should be worried the clinic staff might have forgotten about me if I’d been waiting more than 15 minutes?
Don’t get me wrong: I understand that unpreventable delays happen. For me, the most frustrating aspect of signs like this is that they take the power away from the patient.
View full post
Dec 22, 2014, 2:58 PM, Posted by
Pooja Mehta, MD, is a generalist obstetrician/gynecologist and a second-year Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) Clinical Scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, with support from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Rebekah Gee, MD, MHS, is Medicaid Medical Director for the state of Louisiana, an assistant professor of health policy and management, and obstetrics and gynecology at Louisiana State University and an alumna of the RWJF Clinical Scholars program.*
The theory of disruptive innovation seeks to explain how complicated, expensive systems may eventually be replaced by simpler, more affordable solutions, driven by new entrants into a market who “disrupt” an older, less efficient, and less accessible order.
In the new issue of Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, we track the history of the RWJF Clinical Scholars program (CSP) in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, and offer a curated selection of pieces that suggest that our discipline—now peppered with experts in health services research and health policy trained through the CSP—could be teetering at the precipice of an era of such disruptive innovation.
Highlighting the work of nine current and past scholars, among more than 40 Clinical Scholars working in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, this journal issue covers a range of cutting-edge concepts currently being developed and employed to transform our field from the inside out.
Nathaniel DeNicola, MD, (‘11) discusses the potential uses of social media to disseminate and advance new findings and recommendations to broader audiences. Laurie Zephyrin, MD, MBA, (’03) illuminates how efforts to integrate systems, create interdisciplinary initiatives, and how research-clinical partnerships have allowed for rapid organizational and cultural change and have advanced reproductive health care in the Veterans Affairs system.
Elizabeth Krans, MD, (‘09) writes about ways in which new public funding is allowing for disruptive innovation in the delivery of prenatal care—for example, through dissemination of the highly decentralized, patient-driven Centering Pregnancy model. Working from within a city health department, Erin Saleeby, MD, (‘10) writes about how participatory approaches to public health governance can engage community and clinician leaders in the process of redesigning reproductive care and transforming outcomes.
View full post