“Our larger objective was to improve physician cost profiling. It’s used by a large number of health plans…but there are a lot of criticisms about the methodologies.”— Justin Timbie, PhD, RAND health policy researcher and project director for the grant.
Dates of Project: November 2010 through April 2012
Field of Work: Physician cost profiling
Problem Synopsis: Physician cost profiling is an empirical tool that commercial health insurers and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services use, along with quality metrics, to rank or reward physicians and to provide feedback to them.
In earlier studies, RAND researchers found that current methods of developing physician cost profiles could lead to inaccurate or conflicting results. Conventional methods of ranking physicians do not account for differences in the types of services provided by physicians within the same specialty. Conventional methods also do not adjust for the socioeconomic status of the patients, and some physicians believe this could lead to biased comparisons.
Synopsis of the Work: The RAND staff conducted two studies:
- An analysis of the relationship between a patient’s socioeconomic status and the cost of episodes of care attributed to individual physicians as well as the impact of adjusting for socioeconomic status on physicians’ cost ranking.
- The application of a new method, propensity score weighting, to compare the cost of care provided by individual physicians with their peers who provide similar services.
- Adjusting for patients’ socioeconomic status had little impact on a physician’s cost ranking.
- Physicians’ cost rankings differed significantly between propensity score weighting and conventional methods.
- Propensity score weighting provided a flexible framework for identifying subsets of physicians who provide similar types of services.
RAND found that identifying medical specialty subsets affects where physicians rank in cost comparisons
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Progress and lessons learned from two programs that seek to advance the impact digital games can have on health.
Joint Commission Resources in Oak Brook Ill., oversaw development and testing of an online course and support materials to improve communica...
The rapid rise of antibiotic resistance can be tracked using ResistanceMap, an online tool that visually highlights regions of the country w...
Report examines, compares and contrasts Massachusetts and Utah health insurance exchanges.
Report examines issues states will face as they integrate Medicaid into the exchange.
This poll shows most Americans believe the quality of U.S. health care is average at best. More than half of American adults surveyed barely...
Want to improve health? Start with where we live, work, learn and play.
Health care reform may create incentives to spur the growth in HDHPs and CDHPs, a move that might help hold costs down?at least for a time.
The authors suggest repairing the health care system by realigning provider incentives, increasing the availability of information with whic...
While the ACA is aimed primarily at improving individual health by increasing access to health insurance, it also contains a number of provi...