In this paper, Harold D. Miller of the RWJF-commissioned Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform takes an in-depth look at practical ways to successfully manage the multifaceted implementation challenges inherent with payment reform initiatives, using lessons learned from previous efforts.
From the Report
There is widespread agreement that current methods of paying for health care contribute to both high costs and poor quality. Not only do they create strong incentives to increase the volume of services delivered, current payment methods often create barriers to delivering higher quality and more efficient care and can even penalize health care providers for keeping people healthy, reducing errors and complications, and avoiding unnecessary services.
To date the only broadly implemented changes in payment systems to try and address these issues have been pay-for-performance (P4P) programs. Although P4P programs have encouraged some improvements in quality, most involve relatively small amounts of funding and focus on relatively few care processes. Most importantly, they do not correct the problems in the underlying payment systems, falling short of the reform needed to deliver true change.
Two fundamental types of reforms in payment systems are needed:
Episode-of-Care Payment, i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services which are provided to a patient during a single episode of care (e.g., the treatment of a heart attack), rather than making separate payments to hospitals, physicians, and other providers and rather than paying more for services needed to address preventable complications. Episode of Care Payment gives the involved providers an incentive to coordinate their activities, eliminate unnecessary services, and avoid preventable complications.
Comprehensive Care Payment (often called “global payment”), i.e., paying a single amount to cover all of the services needed to manage a patient’s conditions during a fixed period of time, regardless of how many separate episodes of care occur. This gives the providers involved in the patient’s care the flexibility to try innovative approaches and tailor services based on the patient’s needs, and it gives
them an incentive to avoid hospitalizations and unnecessary or overly-expensive services.
Although there is now growing recognition that these kinds of payment reforms are necessary if significant improvements in health care quality and costs are to be achieved, the challenge has become convincing health care providers, payers, purchasers, and consumers that they are feasible and helping them overcome the significant hurdles to implementation. The changes are inherently complex and risky, and the payers, providers, and communities that are interested in pursuing them face many practical challenges in doing so.
- 1. Aligning Forces for Quality: At the Forefront of Reform
- 2. Aligning Forces for Quality Report
- 3. How Registries Can Help Performance Measurement Improve Care
- 4. The ABCs of Measurement
- 5. Provisions Related to Quality in the New Health Reform Law
- 6. The State of Health Care Quality 2009
- 7. An Overview of Final Regulations Implementing HITECH's Meaningful Use Provisions and Their Implications for Regional Collaboratives
- 8. Making Reform a Reality
- 9. Quality & Equality in U.S. Health Care
- 10. How to Display Comparative Information that People Can Understand and Use
- 11. How to Describe the Health and Community Context for Comparative Performance Reports
- 12. Sample Site for Reporting Health Care Quality Data
- 13. Consumer Decision Points in Accessing Comparative Health Care Information
- 14. Improving Care Coordination by Streamlining Patient Referrals
- 15. Modifying the Admission Process to Improve the Collection and Accuracy of REL Data Collection
- 16. Modifying the Registration System to Accurately and Efficiently Capture Patient Language Preference
- 17. Ensuring REL Data Collection with the Use of a Post-Discharge Survey Tool
- 18. Ensuring Interpreter Qualifications and Standards Through Vendor Contracts
- 19. Educating and Motivating the Community to Reduce Disparities
While the need to address disparities in care is well known, few strategies for reducing disparities have been studied systematically.
RWJF examines the types of competitive foods - foods and beverages schools offer outside of meal programs - available in our nation's school...
Recent studies have demonstrated a connection between low-socioeconomic status and poor health in children. This study builds upon previous ...
This study examined the impact that race has on the prevalence of self-reported diabetes for Hispanic and non-Hispanic people. Data from the...
In this article, the authors consider the social, structural and symbolic effects of the recent and rapid spread of legal gambling in the Un...
Immigrants and their children are one of the fastest growing components of the U.S. population. One in five Americans under the age of 18 is...
Most studies investigating links between social capital and health have relied on work by Robert Putnam who conceptualized social capital as...
The present article considered cardiovascular patients' adherence to physicians' medication recommendations. Nonadherence was defined as fol...
This study examined the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among children in the United States. Also of interest ...
The current article explored risk factors for iron deficiency for toddlers in the United States with a focus on Hispanic toddlers. Data from...
The research presented in this article compared the density and concentration of pro-tobacco media messages in African-American and White ma...
This article describes efforts to use information on influenza burden and vaccine efficacy to estimate how influenza vaccine recommendations...